11.07.2015 Views

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 62. Logistic Regression of Child’s Social-Emotional Skills at Year 5 aPredictor Variable Odds Ratio Sig. Odds Ratio Sig.Average number of services used, years 2–5 0.9 NS — —Ever received help with parenting information, years 2–5 — — 0.8 NSBaseline CharacteristicsRace/nativityBlack—U.S.-born 12.0 *** 11.8 ***Black—foreign-born 7.8 ** 7.2 **Hispanic—U.S.-born 3.2 ^ 3.4 ^Hispanic—foreign-born (excluded category) — — — —White/other 11.2 *** 11.4 ***EducationLess than high school diploma 1.6 NS 1.4 NSHigh school graduate 0.9 NS 0.8 NSPost–high school education (excluded category) — — — —Teen mother (at birth of focal child) 1.0 NS 1.0 NSGlades 0.8 NS 0.8 NSNumber of children 1.1 NS 1.1 NSLives with partner 1.3 NS 1.2 NSMother employed 0.8 NS 0.7 NSAt or below poverty line 0.5 NS 0.6 NSFocal child with special needs 0.9 NS 0.9 NSNumber of housing problems 0.7 * 0.7 *Depression: CES-D score > 16 0.6 NS 0.6 NS<strong>Family</strong>/friend support score 1.0 NS 1.0 NSOverall parenting score 1.7 NS 1.5 NSInvestigated or indicated DCF report 0.5 NS 0.5 NSChildcare arrangements (year 5)Non-QIS center 1.7 NS 1.6 NS<strong>Family</strong> childcare 0.7 NS 0.7 NSFriend/neighbor/other 0.7 NS 0.5 NSParent/relatives 0.6 NS 0.6 NS—QIS center (excluded category) — — — —Age of focal child at year 5 0.8 ^ 0.8 ^χ 2 60.0*** 59.3***a Data were not weighted in this analysis.∧p ≤ .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!