BibliographyAbidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index (3rd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,Inc.Akinbami, L. (2006). <strong>The</strong> state of childhood asthma, United States, 1980–2005. Advance Data, 381, 1–24.American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. According to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry(http://www.aapd.com), children should first visit a dentist when they get their first tooth or nolater than their first birthday. Pediatricians and childcare providers might also encourage mothers’use of dental care. Florida participates in a “Head Start Dental Home Initiative,” which mightinfluence families whose children are enrolled in Head Start and Early Head Start.Andreassen, C., & Fletcher, P. (2007). Early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS–B)psychometric report for the 2-year data collection (NCES 2007–084). National Center forEducation Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington,DC. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007084Antle, B. F., Frey, A., Barbee, A., Frey, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Cox, M. (2008). Child care subsidy andprogram quality revisited. Early Education & Development, 19, 560–573.Attree, P. (2005). Parenting support in the context of poverty: A meta-synthesis of the qualitativeevidence. Health and Social Care in the Community, 13, 330–337.Balaji, A. B, Claussen, A. H., Smith, D. C., Visser, S. N., Morales, M. J., & Perou, R. (2007). Socialsupport networks and maternal mental health and well-being. Journal of Women’s Health, 16,1386–1396.Beals, D., De Temple, J., & Dickinson, D. (1994). Talking and listening that support early literacydevelopment of children from low-income families. In D. Dickinson (Ed.), Bridges to literacy:Children, families, and schools (pp. 19–42). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Bornstein, M. H. (1991). Approaches to parenting in culture. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Culturalapproaches to parenting (pp. 3–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review ofPsychology, 53, 371–399.Bradley, R., & Corwyn, R. (2007). Externalizing problems in fifth grade: Relations with productiveactivity, maternal sensitivity, and harsh parenting from infancy through middle childhood.Developmental Psychology, 43, 1390–1401.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 147
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). <strong>The</strong> ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as context for human development: Researchperspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Do you believe in magic?: What we can expect from early childhoodintervention programs. Social Policy <strong>Report</strong>, 17, 3–4.Burchinal, M. R., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Pianta, R., & Howes, C. (2002). Development of academic skillsfrom preschool through second grade: <strong>Family</strong> and classroom predictors of developmentaltrajectories. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 415–436.Castro, D. C., Bryant, D. M., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Skinner, M. L. (2004). Parent involvement inHead Start Programs: <strong>The</strong> role of parent, teacher and classroom characteristics. Early ChildhoodResearch Quarterly, 19, 413–431.Chase, R., Arnold, J., Schauben, L., & Shardlow, B. (2005). Childcare use in Minnesota: 2004 statewidehousehold childcare survey. St. Paul, MN: Wilder Research.Chase-Lansdale, P. L., Valdovinos D'Angelo, A., & Palacios, N. A. (2007). A multidisciplinaryperspective on the development of young children in Mexican American immigrant families. In M.H. Bornstein, K. Deater-Deckard & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Immigrant families: Multidisciplinaryviews on the 21st century. New York: Guilford Press.Chang, Y., Fine, M. A., Ispa, J., Thornburg, K. R., Sharp, E., & Wolfenstein, M. (2004). Understandingparenting stress among young, low-income, African-American, first-time mothers. EarlyEducation and Development, 15, 265–282.Chernoff, J. J., Flanagan, K. D., McPhee, C., & Park, J. (2007). Preschool: first findings from the thirdfollow-up of the early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B) (No. NCED 2008-025).Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education.Children’s Services Council (2007). Policy brief on declines in participation in Florida’s KidCareprogram declined statewide and in <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> between 2004 and 2006Children’s Services Council. (2008). State of the child in <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong>: Early care andeducation―school readiness update. Retrieved July 16, 2008, fromhttp://cache.trustedpartner.com/docs/library/000238/ECESchool_Readiness2008.pdfChildren’s Services Council. (2010). State of the child: 2010 school readiness update <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong><strong>County</strong>. Retrieved April 8, <strong>2011</strong> fromhttp://cache.trustedpartner.com/docs/library/000238/CORRECTEDSchoolReadiness.pdfCovering Kids and Families. (2005). One in 4 uninsured children in Florida had no medical care for theentire year. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://www.coveringkidsandfamilies.orgDaro, D., Howard, E., Tobin, J. & Harden, A. (2005). Welcome Home and Early Start: An assessment ofprogram quality and outcomes. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, 142 pp.De Feyter, J. J. & Winsler, A. (2009). <strong>The</strong> early developmental competencies and school readiness oflow-income, immigrant children: Influences of generation, race/ethnicity, and national origins.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 411–431.Dickinson, D. K. (Ed.). (1994). Bridges to literacy: Children, families, and schools. Cambridge, MA:Blackwell Publishers.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 148
- Page 1 and 2:
FifthMarciaGouvêa2011
- Page 3:
AcknowledgmentsThis fifth report of
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapin Hall at the University of Ch
- Page 8 and 9:
List of TablesTable 1. Components o
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 58. Logistic Regression of Mo
- Page 12 and 13:
Table C- 24. Mothers’ Baseline an
- Page 16 and 17:
• In addition, we observed a pote
- Page 18 and 19:
kind of out-of-home educational exp
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionOver the last three dec
- Page 22 and 23:
eadiness and school success and in
- Page 24 and 25:
The study’s comprehensive, longit
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 2. Characteristics of Mothers
- Page 28 and 29:
The Year 5 Study SampleTable 4 show
- Page 30 and 31:
Household Structure, Employment, an
- Page 32 and 33:
Although mothers continued to repor
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Family Income and Economic
- Page 36 and 37:
Specifically, mothers living outsid
- Page 38 and 39:
at the birth of the focal child tha
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 10. Reasons for Transportatio
- Page 42 and 43:
Health, Healthcare, and ChildDevelo
- Page 44 and 45:
two years of the study. In year 1 1
- Page 46 and 47:
Subsequent Pregnancies and Prenatal
- Page 48 and 49:
Children’s HealthcareMost (80%) o
- Page 50 and 51:
private plans or HMOs increased sig
- Page 52 and 53:
outside the TGAs to report that all
- Page 54 and 55:
Children’s Behavior and Developme
- Page 56 and 57:
cultural norms regarding what sorts
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 21. Emerging Pre-academic Ski
- Page 60 and 61:
the year 5 interview, over three-qu
- Page 62:
various activities, mothers reporte
- Page 66 and 67:
Negative Parenting PracticesThere i
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 28. Fathers’ Negative Paren
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 30. Parent Involvement Activi
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 32. Mothers’ Positive Paren
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 34. Mothers’ Parent Involve
- Page 76 and 77:
The most frequent parent involvemen
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3. Primary Childcare Arrange
- Page 80 and 81:
for 6 months, but when the subsidy
- Page 82 and 83:
ecause it is of particular interest
- Page 84 and 85:
types of care between mothers whose
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 40. Characteristics of Mother
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 41). Of the 204 children, 91
- Page 90 and 91:
commented on their children’s nee
- Page 92 and 93:
nonparental childcare arrangement f
- Page 94 and 95:
Informal and Community SupportAn un
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 46. Frequency of Husband/Part
- Page 98 and 99:
We also asked the mothers about the
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 49. Type of Family/Friends Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Access to Support by TGAFigure 5 sh
- Page 104 and 105:
Use of Formal ServicesA central que
- Page 106 and 107:
Correlates of At-Risk StatusA large
- Page 108 and 109:
services after 6 months. Among the
- Page 110 and 111:
Enhanced ServicesEnhanced services
- Page 112 and 113:
Termination of MCHP ServicesAs prev
- Page 114 and 115:
services were fairly stable, althou
- Page 116 and 117: languages. The fact that more mothe
- Page 118 and 119: In interpreting these results, it s
- Page 120 and 121: Overall, mothers reported seeking h
- Page 122 and 123: We found that in years 2 and 3, aft
- Page 124 and 125: We also found that mothers tended t
- Page 126 and 127: variables that could potentially be
- Page 128 and 129: significant levels of stress. Paren
- Page 130 and 131: positive parenting items and 5 nega
- Page 132 and 133: friend/neighbor/other), which were
- Page 134 and 135: Table 60. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 136 and 137: Table 62. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 138 and 139: Table 64. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 140 and 141: County in either fall 2009 or fall
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 6. Percent of Focal Children
- Page 144 and 145: Next, we conducted logistic regress
- Page 146 and 147: Table 68. Selected Maternal and Chi
- Page 148 and 149: R 2 .180*p < .05, **p < .01, or ***
- Page 150 and 151: SummarySimilar to previous analyses
- Page 152 and 153: less than a high school education,
- Page 154 and 155: Parenting PracticesWhen surveyed in
- Page 156 and 157: We also looked at the stability of
- Page 158 and 159: Service Use, Maternal Functioning,
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusions and ImplicationsMore th
- Page 162 and 163: Meanwhile, our findings indicate th
- Page 164 and 165: literacy skills, families who do no
- Page 168 and 169: Dinan, K. A. (2005a). Federal polic
- Page 170 and 171: Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., McC
- Page 172 and 173: Weisner, T. S. (1984). A cross-cult
- Page 174 and 175: What are pathways to service use? W
- Page 176 and 177: Table A- 1. FOCiS Codes for MCHP Se
- Page 178 and 179: Table A- 2. Interview Study Samplin
- Page 180 and 181: Table A- 3. Household Survey Topics
- Page 182 and 183: Table A- 5. Reasons for Sample Attr
- Page 184 and 185: we sought to identify the ecologica
- Page 186 and 187: Table B- 2. Characteritics of TGA M
- Page 188 and 189: Figure B- 1. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 190 and 191: Figure B- 3. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 192 and 193: Figure B- 5. Percentage of PBC Moth
- Page 194 and 195: Table B- 5. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 196 and 197: Figure B- 7. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 198 and 199: Table B- 7. Characteristics of TGA
- Page 200 and 201: Table B- 9. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 202 and 203: Type of Enhanced Service2009N% of M
- Page 204 and 205: Table B- 12. Logistic Regression Pr
- Page 206 and 207: Numberof BirthswithReferrals2009 TG
- Page 208 and 209: Table B- 15. OLS Logistic Regressio
- Page 210 and 211: Table C- 1. Selected Characteristic
- Page 212 and 213: Table C- 4. Social and Emotional Be
- Page 214 and 215: Table C- 7. Communication Skills of
- Page 216 and 217:
Table C- 11. Emerging Literacy and
- Page 218 and 219:
Table C- 14. Mothers’ Negative Pa
- Page 220 and 221:
Number of Different Arrangements ac
- Page 222 and 223:
Figure C- 1. Mean Days of MCHP Serv
- Page 224 and 225:
Table C- 19. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 226 and 227:
Table C- 22. Number of Service Area
- Page 228 and 229:
Table C- 23. Number of Services Use
- Page 230 and 231:
Table C- 25. Linear Regression Anal
- Page 232 and 233:
Table C- 27. Baseline Characteristi