Figure B- 3. Characteristics of Mothers with Newborns in TGAs aa Source: Vital Statistics. Sample numbers exclude mothers who gave birth in <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> but were residents of othercounties and mothers who responded “I don’t know” to any item. Mothers who had multiple births were counted once.bTo be consistent with the racial/ethnic categories in the survey, mothers who identified as Haitian are coded as black.c Chapin Hall risk index (see note in Figure B- 1).Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 171
Table B- 4. Percentage of PBC Mothers in MCHP FOCiS Data System, 2004–2009 aSampleBirthEvents bIn MCHP FOCiSData System cIn MCHP FOCiSActivity File dMCHP TreatmentActivity eN n n % n %2004–2005 Birth Cohort 29,620 24,725 83 20,132 68 7,956 27Non-TGAs 17,185 13,535 79 10,171 59 2,926 17TGAs 12,435 11,190 90 9,961 80 5,030 402006 Birth Cohort 15,434 13,298 86 9,388 61 4,357 28Non-TGAs 8,718 7,152 82 4,228 48 1,595 18TGAs 6,716 6,146 92 5,160 77 2,762 412007 Birth Cohort 15,414 13,631 88 9,385 61 4,384 28Non-TGAs 8,785 7,460 85 4,313 49 1,608 18TGAs 6,629 6,171 93 5,072 77 2,776 422008 Birth Cohort 14,943 13,724 92 9,049 61 4,324 29Non-TGAs 8,578 7,699 90 4,237 49 1,679 20TGAs 6,365 6,025 95 4,812 76 2,645 422009 Birth Cohort 13,897 12,623 91 7,917 57 3,149 23Non-TGAs 8,053 7,111 88 3,788 47 1,295 16TGAs 5,844 5,512 94 4,129 71 1,854 322004–2009 Birth Cohort 89,308 78,001 87 55,871 63 24,170 27Non-TGAs 51,319 42,957 84 26,737 52 9,103 18TGAs 37,989 35,044 92 29,134 77 15,067 40a Source: Vital Statistics and FOCiS (2004–2009). Data for the year 5 study sample were weighted to account for oversamplingof mothers “at risk” and mothers residing in the Glades TGA. This data reports Maternal Child Health Partnership service usethat is slightly different than was reported in the year 3 report due to updated activity data.b<strong>The</strong> birth of twins, triplets, and other multiples are counted as one birth event. Of the birth events in <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> from2004 through 2009, 1.9 percent had more than a single birth; 1.5 percent of TGA birth events had more than a single birth.cThis is not a measure of how many mothers were served by the HB system, but rather how many families had at least somecontact with the HB system.d This is a measure of how many families were served at least once by the HB system.e This is a measure of how many families were served with a treatment activity, as defined by correspondence between CSC andChapin Hall as the following activity codes: 0,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2021,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,3320,3321,3322,3323,4501,6515,6516,8002,8004,8006,8008, 8013, 8026.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 172
- Page 1 and 2:
FifthMarciaGouvêa2011
- Page 3:
AcknowledgmentsThis fifth report of
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapin Hall at the University of Ch
- Page 8 and 9:
List of TablesTable 1. Components o
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 58. Logistic Regression of Mo
- Page 12 and 13:
Table C- 24. Mothers’ Baseline an
- Page 16 and 17:
• In addition, we observed a pote
- Page 18 and 19:
kind of out-of-home educational exp
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionOver the last three dec
- Page 22 and 23:
eadiness and school success and in
- Page 24 and 25:
The study’s comprehensive, longit
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 2. Characteristics of Mothers
- Page 28 and 29:
The Year 5 Study SampleTable 4 show
- Page 30 and 31:
Household Structure, Employment, an
- Page 32 and 33:
Although mothers continued to repor
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Family Income and Economic
- Page 36 and 37:
Specifically, mothers living outsid
- Page 38 and 39:
at the birth of the focal child tha
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 10. Reasons for Transportatio
- Page 42 and 43:
Health, Healthcare, and ChildDevelo
- Page 44 and 45:
two years of the study. In year 1 1
- Page 46 and 47:
Subsequent Pregnancies and Prenatal
- Page 48 and 49:
Children’s HealthcareMost (80%) o
- Page 50 and 51:
private plans or HMOs increased sig
- Page 52 and 53:
outside the TGAs to report that all
- Page 54 and 55:
Children’s Behavior and Developme
- Page 56 and 57:
cultural norms regarding what sorts
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 21. Emerging Pre-academic Ski
- Page 60 and 61:
the year 5 interview, over three-qu
- Page 62:
various activities, mothers reporte
- Page 66 and 67:
Negative Parenting PracticesThere i
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 28. Fathers’ Negative Paren
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 30. Parent Involvement Activi
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 32. Mothers’ Positive Paren
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 34. Mothers’ Parent Involve
- Page 76 and 77:
The most frequent parent involvemen
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3. Primary Childcare Arrange
- Page 80 and 81:
for 6 months, but when the subsidy
- Page 82 and 83:
ecause it is of particular interest
- Page 84 and 85:
types of care between mothers whose
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 40. Characteristics of Mother
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 41). Of the 204 children, 91
- Page 90 and 91:
commented on their children’s nee
- Page 92 and 93:
nonparental childcare arrangement f
- Page 94 and 95:
Informal and Community SupportAn un
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 46. Frequency of Husband/Part
- Page 98 and 99:
We also asked the mothers about the
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 49. Type of Family/Friends Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Access to Support by TGAFigure 5 sh
- Page 104 and 105:
Use of Formal ServicesA central que
- Page 106 and 107:
Correlates of At-Risk StatusA large
- Page 108 and 109:
services after 6 months. Among the
- Page 110 and 111:
Enhanced ServicesEnhanced services
- Page 112 and 113:
Termination of MCHP ServicesAs prev
- Page 114 and 115:
services were fairly stable, althou
- Page 116 and 117:
languages. The fact that more mothe
- Page 118 and 119:
In interpreting these results, it s
- Page 120 and 121:
Overall, mothers reported seeking h
- Page 122 and 123:
We found that in years 2 and 3, aft
- Page 124 and 125:
We also found that mothers tended t
- Page 126 and 127:
variables that could potentially be
- Page 128 and 129:
significant levels of stress. Paren
- Page 130 and 131:
positive parenting items and 5 nega
- Page 132 and 133:
friend/neighbor/other), which were
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 60. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 62. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 138 and 139:
Table 64. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 140 and 141: County in either fall 2009 or fall
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 6. Percent of Focal Children
- Page 144 and 145: Next, we conducted logistic regress
- Page 146 and 147: Table 68. Selected Maternal and Chi
- Page 148 and 149: R 2 .180*p < .05, **p < .01, or ***
- Page 150 and 151: SummarySimilar to previous analyses
- Page 152 and 153: less than a high school education,
- Page 154 and 155: Parenting PracticesWhen surveyed in
- Page 156 and 157: We also looked at the stability of
- Page 158 and 159: Service Use, Maternal Functioning,
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusions and ImplicationsMore th
- Page 162 and 163: Meanwhile, our findings indicate th
- Page 164 and 165: literacy skills, families who do no
- Page 166 and 167: BibliographyAbidin, R. R. (1995). P
- Page 168 and 169: Dinan, K. A. (2005a). Federal polic
- Page 170 and 171: Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., McC
- Page 172 and 173: Weisner, T. S. (1984). A cross-cult
- Page 174 and 175: What are pathways to service use? W
- Page 176 and 177: Table A- 1. FOCiS Codes for MCHP Se
- Page 178 and 179: Table A- 2. Interview Study Samplin
- Page 180 and 181: Table A- 3. Household Survey Topics
- Page 182 and 183: Table A- 5. Reasons for Sample Attr
- Page 184 and 185: we sought to identify the ecologica
- Page 186 and 187: Table B- 2. Characteritics of TGA M
- Page 188 and 189: Figure B- 1. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 192 and 193: Figure B- 5. Percentage of PBC Moth
- Page 194 and 195: Table B- 5. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 196 and 197: Figure B- 7. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 198 and 199: Table B- 7. Characteristics of TGA
- Page 200 and 201: Table B- 9. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 202 and 203: Type of Enhanced Service2009N% of M
- Page 204 and 205: Table B- 12. Logistic Regression Pr
- Page 206 and 207: Numberof BirthswithReferrals2009 TG
- Page 208 and 209: Table B- 15. OLS Logistic Regressio
- Page 210 and 211: Table C- 1. Selected Characteristic
- Page 212 and 213: Table C- 4. Social and Emotional Be
- Page 214 and 215: Table C- 7. Communication Skills of
- Page 216 and 217: Table C- 11. Emerging Literacy and
- Page 218 and 219: Table C- 14. Mothers’ Negative Pa
- Page 220 and 221: Number of Different Arrangements ac
- Page 222 and 223: Figure C- 1. Mean Days of MCHP Serv
- Page 224 and 225: Table C- 19. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 226 and 227: Table C- 22. Number of Service Area
- Page 228 and 229: Table C- 23. Number of Services Use
- Page 230 and 231: Table C- 25. Linear Regression Anal
- Page 232 and 233: Table C- 27. Baseline Characteristi