11.07.2015 Views

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 63. Logistic Regression of Child’s Use of Books at Year 5 aPredictor Variable Odds Ratio Sig. Odds Ratio Sig.Average number of services, years 2–5 1.0 NS — —Ever received help with parenting information, years 2–5 — — 1.1 NSBaseline CharacteristicsRace/nativityBlack—U.S.-born 1.9 NS 2.1 NSBlack—foreign-born 2.4 NS 3.1 *Hispanic—U.S.-born 2.1 NS 2.3 NSHispanic—foreign-born (excluded category) — — — —White/other 2.0 NS 2.2 NSEducationLess than high school diploma 1.0 NS 0.9 NSHigh school graduate 0.9 NS 0.8 NSPost–high school education (excluded category) — — — —Teen mother (at birth of focal child) 0.9 NS 1.0 NSGlades 0.6 NS 0.6 NSNumber of children 0.9 NS 0.9 NSLives with partner 0.7 NS 0.7 NSMother employed 0.6 NS 0.5 NSAt or below poverty line 1.2 NS 1.1 NSFocal child with special needs 0.8 NS 0.8 NSNumber of housing problems 0.9 NS 0.9 NSDepression: CES-D score > 16 0.6 NS 0.6 ^<strong>Family</strong>/friend support score 1.1 NS 1.1 NSOverall parenting score 1.5 NS 1.5 NSInvestigated or indicated DCF report (years 1–3) 0.7 NS 0.7 NSChildcare arrangements (year 5)Non-QIS center 2.8 * 2.7 *<strong>Family</strong> childcare 3.5 NS 3.5 NSFriend/neighbor/other 0.4 NS 0.4 NSParent/relatives 1.0 NS 1.0 NSQIS center (excluded category) — — — —Age of focal child at year 5 1.0 NS 1.0 NSχ 2 36.6* 38.5*a Data were not weighted in this analysis.∧ p ≤ .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!