2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

Appendix B: Additional Data onPBC and TGA Birth Cohorts,2004–2009Table B- 1. Risk Screen Scores of Mothers with Newborns, 2004–2009 aScreen Score in FOCiS Database “At Risk” Screen Score bSampleN% All% All % MothersNnMothersMothers Screened2004–2005 Birth Cohort 29,620 21,556 73 6,858 23 32Non-TGAs 17,185 11,515 67 2,455 14 21TGAs 12,435 10,041 81 4,403 35 442006 Birth Cohort 15,434 11,798 76 3,962 26 34Non-TGAs 8,718 6,176 71 1,422 16 23TGAs 6,716 5,622 84 2,540 38 452007 Birth Cohort 15,414 12,338 80 4,054 26 33Non-TGAs 8,785 6,657 76 1,471 17 22TGAs 6,629 5,681 86 2,583 39 452008 Birth Cohort 14,943 12,562 84 4,052 27 32Non-TGAs 8,578 6,972 81 1,532 18 22TGAs 6,365 5,590 88 2,520 40 452009 Birth Cohort 13,897 10,409 75 2,977 21 29Non-TGAs 8,053 5,785 72 1,124 14 19TGAs 5,844 4,624 79 1,853 32 402004–2009 Birth Cohort 89,308 68,663 77 21,903 25 32Non-TGAs 51,319 37,105 72 8,004 16 22TGAs 37,989 31,558 83 13,899 37 44a Source: Vital Statistics and FOCiS (2004–2009). Data for the year 5 study sample were weighted to account for oversamplingof mothers “at risk” and mothers residing in the Glades TGA. The birth of twins, triplets, and other multiples are counted as onebirth event. This data reports Maternal Child Health Partnership risk screening that is slightly different than was reported in theyear 3 report due to updated score data.b “At Risk” indicates a score of 4 or above on the Healthy Start risk screen.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 166