Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., McCormick, M. C., & McCarton, C. (2000). Patterns of service use inpreschool children: Correlates, consequences, and the role of intervention. Child Development, 71,802–819.Liang, X., <strong>Full</strong>er, B., & Singer, J. D. (2000). Ethnic differences in child care selection: <strong>The</strong> influence offamily structure, parental practices, and home language. Early Education Research Quarterly, 15,357–384.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Lippman, L., Vandivere, S., Keith, J., & Atienza, A. (2008). Childcare use by low-income families:Variations across states. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Retrieved July 2, 2008, fromhttp://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2008_07_02_RB_ChildCareLowIncome.pdfLowe, E. D. & Weisner, T. (2004). “You have to push it”―who’s going to raise your kids?: Situatingchildcare and childcare subsidy use in the daily routines of lower income families. Children andYouth Services Review, 26, 143–171.Lyons, S., Karlstrom, M., & Haywood, T. (2007). Implementation study of the comprehensive servicesprogram of <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong>, Florida: Final report. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University ofChicago.Martinez-Schallmoser, L., MacMullen, N. & Telleen, S. (2003). <strong>The</strong> effect of social support andacculturation on postpartum depression in Mexican-American women. Journal of TransculturalNursing, 14, 329–333.McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53,185–204.Meidel, W. T., & Reynolds, A. J. (1999). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantagedchildren: Does it matter? Journal of School Psychology, 37, 379–402.Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications.National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Early childhoodlongitudinal study birth cohort.National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education. (2007).Nationalestimates of participation in afterschool programs.National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Snow, C. E., Burns,M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: <strong>The</strong>science of early childhood development: executive summary. Committee on Integrating theScience of Early Childhood Development; Shonkoff, J. P, & Phillips, D. A. (Eds). Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press.NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlersand preschoolers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 116–135.NICHD Early Childcare Research Network. (2007). Age of entry to kindergarten and children’s academicand socioemotional development. Early Education & Development, 18, 337-368.Nihira, K., Weisner, T. S., & Bernheimer, L. P. (1994). Ecocultural assessment in families of childrenwith developmental delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 551–566.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 151
Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H., Hanks, C., Cole, R, Anson, E., Sidora-Arcoleo, K., et al. (2007). Effects ofnurse home visiting on maternal and child functioning: Age-9 follow-up of a randomized trial.Pediatrics, 120, 832–845.Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,Inc.Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2002). Classroom effects onchildren’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal,45, 365–397.Radloff, L. S. (1977). <strong>The</strong> CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the generalpopulation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.Raikes, H., Luze, G., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raikes, H. A., Pan, B., Tamis-LeMonda, C., et al. (2006). Motherchildbook reading in low-income families: Correlates and outcomes during the first three years oflife. Child Development, 77, 924–953.Reynolds, A. J., Ou, S., & Topitzes, J. W. (2004). Paths of effects of early childhood intervention oneducational attainment and delinquency: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago Child-ParentCenters. Child Development, 75, 1299–328.Shen, J., Tackett, W., & Ma, X. (2009). Second Evaluation <strong>Report</strong> for <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> QualityImprovement System (QIS). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan State University.Shlay, A. B., Weinraub, M., Harmon, M., & Tran, H. (2004). Barriers to subsidies: Why low-incomefamilies do not use child care subsidies. Social Science Review, 33, 134–157.Snow, C. E.; Barnes, W. S.; Chandler, J.; Goodman, I. F.; & Hemphill, L. (1991). Home and schoolinfluences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Spielberger, J., Haywood, T., Schuerman, J., Michels, L., & Richman, H. (2005). Evaluation of theChildren’s Behavioral Health Initiative, <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong>, Florida: Final report. Chicago:Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Spielberger, J., Schuerman, J., Lyons, S., & Haywood, T. (2006). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> family study:Baseline report. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Spielberger, J., Lyons, S., Gouvea, M., Haywood, T., & Winje, C. (2007). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> familystudy: Second annual report. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Spielberger, J., Rich, L., Gouvea, M., Winje, C., Scannell, M., Harden, A., et al., (2009). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong><strong>County</strong> family study: Third annual report. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Spielberger, J., Rich, L., Winje, C., & Scannell, M. (2010). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong> family study: Fourthannual report. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Tandon, D. (2004). Access to prenatal care in <strong>Palm</strong> <strong>Beach</strong> <strong>County</strong>: Findings and recommendations.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Uno, D., Florsheim, P., & Uchino, B. (1998). Stress, social support, and parenting practices among whiteand Latino adolescent mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 587–607.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005).Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 152
- Page 1 and 2:
FifthMarciaGouvêa2011
- Page 3:
AcknowledgmentsThis fifth report of
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapin Hall at the University of Ch
- Page 8 and 9:
List of TablesTable 1. Components o
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 58. Logistic Regression of Mo
- Page 12 and 13:
Table C- 24. Mothers’ Baseline an
- Page 16 and 17:
• In addition, we observed a pote
- Page 18 and 19:
kind of out-of-home educational exp
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionOver the last three dec
- Page 22 and 23:
eadiness and school success and in
- Page 24 and 25:
The study’s comprehensive, longit
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 2. Characteristics of Mothers
- Page 28 and 29:
The Year 5 Study SampleTable 4 show
- Page 30 and 31:
Household Structure, Employment, an
- Page 32 and 33:
Although mothers continued to repor
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Family Income and Economic
- Page 36 and 37:
Specifically, mothers living outsid
- Page 38 and 39:
at the birth of the focal child tha
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 10. Reasons for Transportatio
- Page 42 and 43:
Health, Healthcare, and ChildDevelo
- Page 44 and 45:
two years of the study. In year 1 1
- Page 46 and 47:
Subsequent Pregnancies and Prenatal
- Page 48 and 49:
Children’s HealthcareMost (80%) o
- Page 50 and 51:
private plans or HMOs increased sig
- Page 52 and 53:
outside the TGAs to report that all
- Page 54 and 55:
Children’s Behavior and Developme
- Page 56 and 57:
cultural norms regarding what sorts
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 21. Emerging Pre-academic Ski
- Page 60 and 61:
the year 5 interview, over three-qu
- Page 62:
various activities, mothers reporte
- Page 66 and 67:
Negative Parenting PracticesThere i
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 28. Fathers’ Negative Paren
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 30. Parent Involvement Activi
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 32. Mothers’ Positive Paren
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 34. Mothers’ Parent Involve
- Page 76 and 77:
The most frequent parent involvemen
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3. Primary Childcare Arrange
- Page 80 and 81:
for 6 months, but when the subsidy
- Page 82 and 83:
ecause it is of particular interest
- Page 84 and 85:
types of care between mothers whose
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 40. Characteristics of Mother
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 41). Of the 204 children, 91
- Page 90 and 91:
commented on their children’s nee
- Page 92 and 93:
nonparental childcare arrangement f
- Page 94 and 95:
Informal and Community SupportAn un
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 46. Frequency of Husband/Part
- Page 98 and 99:
We also asked the mothers about the
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 49. Type of Family/Friends Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Access to Support by TGAFigure 5 sh
- Page 104 and 105:
Use of Formal ServicesA central que
- Page 106 and 107:
Correlates of At-Risk StatusA large
- Page 108 and 109:
services after 6 months. Among the
- Page 110 and 111:
Enhanced ServicesEnhanced services
- Page 112 and 113:
Termination of MCHP ServicesAs prev
- Page 114 and 115:
services were fairly stable, althou
- Page 116 and 117:
languages. The fact that more mothe
- Page 118 and 119:
In interpreting these results, it s
- Page 120 and 121: Overall, mothers reported seeking h
- Page 122 and 123: We found that in years 2 and 3, aft
- Page 124 and 125: We also found that mothers tended t
- Page 126 and 127: variables that could potentially be
- Page 128 and 129: significant levels of stress. Paren
- Page 130 and 131: positive parenting items and 5 nega
- Page 132 and 133: friend/neighbor/other), which were
- Page 134 and 135: Table 60. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 136 and 137: Table 62. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 138 and 139: Table 64. Logistic Regression of Ch
- Page 140 and 141: County in either fall 2009 or fall
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 6. Percent of Focal Children
- Page 144 and 145: Next, we conducted logistic regress
- Page 146 and 147: Table 68. Selected Maternal and Chi
- Page 148 and 149: R 2 .180*p < .05, **p < .01, or ***
- Page 150 and 151: SummarySimilar to previous analyses
- Page 152 and 153: less than a high school education,
- Page 154 and 155: Parenting PracticesWhen surveyed in
- Page 156 and 157: We also looked at the stability of
- Page 158 and 159: Service Use, Maternal Functioning,
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusions and ImplicationsMore th
- Page 162 and 163: Meanwhile, our findings indicate th
- Page 164 and 165: literacy skills, families who do no
- Page 166 and 167: BibliographyAbidin, R. R. (1995). P
- Page 168 and 169: Dinan, K. A. (2005a). Federal polic
- Page 172 and 173: Weisner, T. S. (1984). A cross-cult
- Page 174 and 175: What are pathways to service use? W
- Page 176 and 177: Table A- 1. FOCiS Codes for MCHP Se
- Page 178 and 179: Table A- 2. Interview Study Samplin
- Page 180 and 181: Table A- 3. Household Survey Topics
- Page 182 and 183: Table A- 5. Reasons for Sample Attr
- Page 184 and 185: we sought to identify the ecologica
- Page 186 and 187: Table B- 2. Characteritics of TGA M
- Page 188 and 189: Figure B- 1. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 190 and 191: Figure B- 3. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 192 and 193: Figure B- 5. Percentage of PBC Moth
- Page 194 and 195: Table B- 5. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 196 and 197: Figure B- 7. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 198 and 199: Table B- 7. Characteristics of TGA
- Page 200 and 201: Table B- 9. Logistic Regression Pre
- Page 202 and 203: Type of Enhanced Service2009N% of M
- Page 204 and 205: Table B- 12. Logistic Regression Pr
- Page 206 and 207: Numberof BirthswithReferrals2009 TG
- Page 208 and 209: Table B- 15. OLS Logistic Regressio
- Page 210 and 211: Table C- 1. Selected Characteristic
- Page 212 and 213: Table C- 4. Social and Emotional Be
- Page 214 and 215: Table C- 7. Communication Skills of
- Page 216 and 217: Table C- 11. Emerging Literacy and
- Page 218 and 219: Table C- 14. Mothers’ Negative Pa
- Page 220 and 221:
Number of Different Arrangements ac
- Page 222 and 223:
Figure C- 1. Mean Days of MCHP Serv
- Page 224 and 225:
Table C- 19. Characteristics of Mot
- Page 226 and 227:
Table C- 22. Number of Service Area
- Page 228 and 229:
Table C- 23. Number of Services Use
- Page 230 and 231:
Table C- 25. Linear Regression Anal
- Page 232 and 233:
Table C- 27. Baseline Characteristi