2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table C- 22. Number of Service Areas Used by Mothers in Glades and Non-Glades TGA overNumber of ServiceYear 1***Time aAreas Used % All Mothers % Glades % Non-Glades(N=310) (n=40) (n=270)0 services used 2 0 21–2 services used 27 13 293–4 services used 53 45 545 or more services used 18 43 14Year 2***% All Mothers % Glades % Non-Glades % Outside TGAs(N=310) (n=38) (n=251) (n=20)0 services used 0 0 0 01–2 services used 38 23 38 703–4 services used 42 33 46 155 or more services used 20 44 16 15Year 3**% All Mothers % Glades % Non-Glades % Outside TGAs(N=310) (n=38) (n=244) (n=29)0 services used 3 0 4 01–2 services used 46 26 51 363–4 services used 34 42 29 615 or more services used 17 32 17 4Year 4**% All Mothers % Glades % Non-Glades % Outside TGAs(N=310) (n=39) (n=235) (n=37)0 services used 5 0 5 131–2 services used 38 15 43 263–4 services used 38 56 34 425 or more services used 20 28 18 18Year-5% All Mothers % Glades % Non-Glades % Outside TGAs(N=310) (n=38) (n=232) (n=41)0 services used 5 0 6 31–2 services used* 25 5 28 283–4 services used 37 47 33 465 or more services used* 34 47 33 23aData were weighted to adjust for oversampling of mothers from the Glades and mothers screened “at risk.”*Denotes z-test of column proportions (or t-test of means where applicable) statistically significant at p < .10 or lower: 1–2services(2) vs. 1–2services(1); 1–2services(2) vs. 1–2services(3); 5+services(1) vs. 5+services(3).*Chi-square tests indicate statistically significant differences between Glades and non-Glades mothers in year 1 (χ 2 = 20.116, p
Table C- 22. Patterns of Service Use by Nativity in 12 Months Prior to Surveys over Time aYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5Service AreaForeignbornborn born born born born born born born bornU.S.- Foreign-U.S.- Foreign-U.S.- Foreign-U.S.- Foreign-U.S.-(n=167) (n=143) (n=167) (n=143) (n=167) (n=143) (n=167) (n=143) (n=167) (n=143)Healthcare for mother or children 78 71 94 97 90 97* 89 89 84 87Getting enough food (WIC, foodstamps)91 87 87 86 75 61* 74 65 73 70<strong>Family</strong> planning or birth control — b — 44 20*** 35 20** 26 13** 29 20Dental care 10 34*** 17 38*** 22 31 46 66*** 52 68**Childcare assistance (includes subsidy) 8 29*** 10 46*** 22 36** 22 56*** 33 51**Parenting information 70 77 20 27 8 15* 2 8* 8 8Paying rent or bills 5 17** 2 19*** 3 19*** 3 20*** 3 30***Housing or emergency shelter c 1 10** 6 14* 3 18*** 3 20*** 4 18***Transportation 17 18 15 16 4 11* 1 8** 5 9Legal issues 1 4 1 4 5 6 4 10* 7 6Employment 2 8** 2 9** 2 4 1 9** 3 16***Clothes for children 4 8 2 7 1 4 2 2 4 6Mental health or substance abuse 1 4 0 4* 3 4 5 11 8 13Translating things into English d — — 12 0 8 0 3 0 9 0Mean (SD) of items common over 3.0 3.9 2.9 3.9 2.6 3.4 2.8 3.8 3.4 4.4time(1.2) (2.2)*** (1.3) (2.2)*** (1.5) (2.1)*** (1.9) (2.2)*** (2.3) (2.5)***a Data were weighted to adjust for oversampling of mothers from the Glades and mothers screened “at risk.”b Item not included in the year 1 survey.c <strong>The</strong> year 1 survey had one item combining housing and emergency shelter, but were asked as two separate items in all subsequent surveys; they are combined in this analysis.d Only those mothers who do not speak English as their primary language were asked this question (n=146, 150, 153, 142).One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests indicate differences are statistically significant at *p < .05, **p < .01, or ***p < .001.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 208
Page 1 and 2:
FifthMarciaGouvêa2011
Page 3:
AcknowledgmentsThis fifth report of
Page 6 and 7:
Chapin Hall at the University of Ch
Page 8 and 9:
List of TablesTable 1. Components o
Page 10 and 11:
Table 58. Logistic Regression of Mo
Page 12 and 13:
Table C- 24. Mothers’ Baseline an
Page 16 and 17:
• In addition, we observed a pote
Page 18 and 19:
kind of out-of-home educational exp
Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionOver the last three dec
Page 22 and 23:
eadiness and school success and in
Page 24 and 25:
The study’s comprehensive, longit
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2. Characteristics of Mothers
Page 28 and 29:
The Year 5 Study SampleTable 4 show
Page 30 and 31:
Household Structure, Employment, an
Page 32 and 33:
Although mothers continued to repor
Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Family Income and Economic
Page 36 and 37:
Specifically, mothers living outsid
Page 38 and 39:
at the birth of the focal child tha
Page 40 and 41:
Table 10. Reasons for Transportatio
Page 42 and 43:
Health, Healthcare, and ChildDevelo
Page 44 and 45:
two years of the study. In year 1 1
Page 46 and 47:
Subsequent Pregnancies and Prenatal
Page 48 and 49:
Children’s HealthcareMost (80%) o
Page 50 and 51:
private plans or HMOs increased sig
Page 52 and 53:
outside the TGAs to report that all
Page 54 and 55:
Children’s Behavior and Developme
Page 56 and 57:
cultural norms regarding what sorts
Page 58 and 59:
Table 21. Emerging Pre-academic Ski
Page 60 and 61:
the year 5 interview, over three-qu
Page 62:
various activities, mothers reporte
Page 66 and 67:
Negative Parenting PracticesThere i
Page 68 and 69:
Table 28. Fathers’ Negative Paren
Page 70 and 71:
Table 30. Parent Involvement Activi
Page 72 and 73:
Table 32. Mothers’ Positive Paren
Page 74 and 75:
Table 34. Mothers’ Parent Involve
Page 76 and 77:
The most frequent parent involvemen
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3. Primary Childcare Arrange
Page 80 and 81:
for 6 months, but when the subsidy
Page 82 and 83:
ecause it is of particular interest
Page 84 and 85:
types of care between mothers whose
Page 86 and 87:
Table 40. Characteristics of Mother
Page 88 and 89:
Table 41). Of the 204 children, 91
Page 90 and 91:
commented on their children’s nee
Page 92 and 93:
nonparental childcare arrangement f
Page 94 and 95:
Informal and Community SupportAn un
Page 96 and 97:
Table 46. Frequency of Husband/Part
Page 98 and 99:
We also asked the mothers about the
Page 100 and 101:
Table 49. Type of Family/Friends Su
Page 102 and 103:
Access to Support by TGAFigure 5 sh
Page 104 and 105:
Use of Formal ServicesA central que
Page 106 and 107:
Correlates of At-Risk StatusA large
Page 108 and 109:
services after 6 months. Among the
Page 110 and 111:
Enhanced ServicesEnhanced services
Page 112 and 113:
Termination of MCHP ServicesAs prev
Page 114 and 115:
services were fairly stable, althou
Page 116 and 117:
languages. The fact that more mothe
Page 118 and 119:
In interpreting these results, it s
Page 120 and 121:
Overall, mothers reported seeking h
Page 122 and 123:
We found that in years 2 and 3, aft
Page 124 and 125:
We also found that mothers tended t
Page 126 and 127:
variables that could potentially be
Page 128 and 129:
significant levels of stress. Paren
Page 130 and 131:
positive parenting items and 5 nega
Page 132 and 133:
friend/neighbor/other), which were
Page 134 and 135:
Table 60. Logistic Regression of Ch
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
County in either fall 2009 or fall
Page 142 and 143:
Figure 6. Percent of Focal Children
Page 144 and 145:
Next, we conducted logistic regress
Page 146 and 147:
Table 68. Selected Maternal and Chi
Page 148 and 149:
R 2 .180*p < .05, **p < .01, or ***
Page 150 and 151:
SummarySimilar to previous analyses
Page 152 and 153:
less than a high school education,
Page 154 and 155:
Parenting PracticesWhen surveyed in
Page 156 and 157:
We also looked at the stability of
Page 158 and 159:
Service Use, Maternal Functioning,
Page 160 and 161:
Conclusions and ImplicationsMore th
Page 162 and 163:
Meanwhile, our findings indicate th
Page 164 and 165:
literacy skills, families who do no
Page 166 and 167:
BibliographyAbidin, R. R. (1995). P
Page 168 and 169:
Dinan, K. A. (2005a). Federal polic
Page 170 and 171:
Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., McC
Page 172 and 173:
Weisner, T. S. (1984). A cross-cult
Page 174 and 175:
What are pathways to service use? W
Page 176 and 177: Table A- 1. FOCiS Codes for MCHP Se
Page 178 and 179: Table A- 2. Interview Study Samplin
Page 180 and 181: Table A- 3. Household Survey Topics
Page 182 and 183: Table A- 5. Reasons for Sample Attr
Page 184 and 185: we sought to identify the ecologica
Page 186 and 187: Table B- 2. Characteritics of TGA M
Page 188 and 189: Figure B- 1. Characteristics of Mot
Page 192 and 193: Figure B- 5. Percentage of PBC Moth
Page 194 and 195: Table B- 5. Logistic Regression Pre
Page 198 and 199: Table B- 7. Characteristics of TGA
Page 200 and 201: Table B- 9. Logistic Regression Pre
Page 202 and 203: Type of Enhanced Service2009N% of M
Page 204 and 205: Table B- 12. Logistic Regression Pr
Page 206 and 207: Numberof BirthswithReferrals2009 TG
Page 208 and 209: Table B- 15. OLS Logistic Regressio
Page 210 and 211: Table C- 1. Selected Characteristic
Page 212 and 213: Table C- 4. Social and Emotional Be
Page 214 and 215: Table C- 7. Communication Skills of
Page 216 and 217: Table C- 11. Emerging Literacy and
Page 218 and 219: Table C- 14. Mothers’ Negative Pa
Page 220 and 221: Number of Different Arrangements ac
Page 222 and 223: Figure C- 1. Mean Days of MCHP Serv
Page 224 and 225: Table C- 19. Characteristics of Mot
Page 228 and 229: Table C- 23. Number of Services Use
Page 230 and 231: Table C- 25. Linear Regression Anal
Page 232 and 233: Table C- 27. Baseline Characteristi
show all

2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?