2011 The Palm Beach County Family Study (Full Report)

Number of Different Arrangements across Nine Time Points b Frequency PercentChild with parent, relative, friend/neighbor, childcare center/Head Start, familychildcare, and multiple arrangements1 0Child with parent, relative, friend/neighbor, family childcare, and multiplearrangements1 0Child with parent, relative, childcare center/Head Start, prekindergarten (schoolbased),and other arrangements1 0Child with parent, relative, childcare center/Head Start, prekindergarten (schoolbased),and multiple arrangements1 0Child with parent, friend/neighbor, and family childcare 1 0Child with parent, childcare center/Head Start, and prekindergarten (school-based) 1 0Child with parent, relative, friend/neighbor, and prekindergarten (school-based) 1 0Child with parent, childcare center/Head Start, prekindergarten (school-based), familychildcare, and multiple arrangements1 0Child with parent, relative, friend/neighbor, childcare center/Head Start, and multiplearrangements1 0Child with relative, friend/neighbor, childcare center/Head Start, family childcare, andother arrangements, and multiple arrangements1 0Child with relative, childcare center/Head Start, family childcare, and multiplearrangements1 0a To perform this analysis, we could not weight the data to account for the oversampling of mothers in the Glades and mothersassessed “at risk.” Twenty-six mothers were not interviewed at one or more of the 6-month telephone follow-up points, but wereinterviewed at all five yearly points. These mothers are included in the other analyses, but are not included in this analysis as wedo not know what type of childcare arrangements their focal child was in for all nine time points.b The nine time points include years 1 (1–6 mos.), 1.5 (6–12 mos.), 2 (12–18 mos.), 2.5 (18–24 mos.), 3 (24–30 mos.), 3.5 (30–36mos.), 4 (36–42 mos.), 4.5 (42–48 mos.), and 5 (48–54 mos.). Some arrangement categories were collapsed in this table.Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 202