ECOPROBE 5 - rs dynamics
ECOPROBE 5 - rs dynamics
ECOPROBE 5 - rs dynamics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SOIL VAPOR SURVEY<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The gases found in pore spaces in soil and rock formations are known as soil vapor. The composition of this<br />
gaseous phase, in particular the presence of organic compounds, reveals vital information about the pollution<br />
of the subsurface environment.<br />
Organic compounds constitute a group of contaminants which impact severely on groundwater resources.<br />
The presence and distribution of such pollutants can be detected using a technique known as Soil Vapor<br />
Survey (SVS) which is based on an analysis of the soil vapor.<br />
The following types of contaminants can be monitored:<br />
1. Liquid hydrocarbons - mainly petroleum products, and chlorinated hydrocarbons such as<br />
industrial solvents and pesticides.<br />
2. Organic vapo<strong>rs</strong> from landfills and from gas leaks.<br />
In situ soil vapor measurements are affected by several subsurface facto<strong>rs</strong> of which the most important are:<br />
1. Presence of methane: As a product of natural biodegradation, methane occu<strong>rs</strong> in varying concentrations<br />
everywhere in the subsurface soil environment.<br />
2. Soil permeability: Soils with differing permeability create differing soil vapor flux conditions. Due to their<br />
texture, relatively impermeable soils such as clay produce soil vapor for a much shorter period of time<br />
compared to highly permeable soils such as sand.<br />
Other facto<strong>rs</strong> are:<br />
3. Zoning: Differences in the physical properties such as vapor pressure, solubility in water, mobility in the<br />
subsurface, resistance to degradation etc. of the various components of a complex contaminant, may give a<br />
heterogeneous character to a pollution plume.<br />
4. Surface contamination: A pollutant occurring in the surface layer will seriously distort the distribution and<br />
concentration patterns of an underlying, deep source of contamination.<br />
5. Age of a contaminant: All petroleum products experience some degree of natural biodegradation in the<br />
subsurface environment. Lighter HC’s are more readily degraded than the heavier compounds. After a<br />
certain period of time the spectral composition of contaminants will dramatically change; moreover, some<br />
contaminants may become morphologized, that is composed of non-toxic aromatic compounds which are<br />
outside the basic hydrocarbon spectrum.<br />
6. Soil temperature: With increasing soil temperature, vapor density decreases which, in turn, promotes the<br />
vapor diffusion rate.<br />
7. Soil moisture: The presence of moisture reduces the effective porosity, which has a negative effect on<br />
the migration and volume of soil vapor available for measuring.<br />
8. Type of contaminant: For the SVS to be applied successfully, the contaminant in question must manifest<br />
a sufficiently high vapor pressure. Some compounds such as transformer oils, PCB’s and certain phenols,<br />
have a very low vapor pressure and require a special sampling technique.<br />
The presence of methane and widely differing soil permeability are the two crucial distorting facto<strong>rs</strong><br />
in soil vapor surveys. Both paramete<strong>rs</strong> dramatically affect the measured values of contaminant<br />
concentrations. Without the benefit of the <strong>ECOPROBE</strong> 5 method, these misleading results can<br />
cause severe misinterpretation of both the in situ and also the laboratory data.<br />
11