12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Algebraic approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> II 481In other words, the spatial momentum is bounded above by the Planck momentumscale (if λ is the Planck time). Indeed, this is immediate from (24.24). Such singularitiesexpressed in accumulation regions are a main discovery of the noncompactbicrossproduct theory visible already in the original examples [13]. They are adirect consequence of the nonlinearity but we also see their origin in the fact thatthe true group fac<strong>to</strong>risation has a ‘curled up’ compact direction. Moreover, thismuch-noted feature of the model is only a small part of the s<strong>to</strong>ry. We see that thefuller s<strong>to</strong>ry is that any point outside this region is boosted <strong>to</strong> infinite negative p 0by a finite boost with a similar s<strong>to</strong>ry for θ and finite momentum as we saw in Figure24.3. Indeed the actions ⊲, ⊳ breakdown at such points as the fac<strong>to</strong>risation itselfbreaks down. Note also that the group inversion which is the natural reversal underCPT symmetry takes us from the ‘best’ region A <strong>to</strong> the ‘worst’ region D, which is afundamental time-asymmetry or non-reversability of the bicrossproduct model.24.3.2 Bicrossproduct U λ (poinc 1,1 ) quantum groupNow, consider θ infinitesimal, i.e. we differentiate all expressions (24.20)–(24.21)by ∂∂θ | 0 which is all we need for the algebraic part of the bicrossproduct Hopf algebra(the full opera<strong>to</strong>r algebra structure needs the full global data). Thus denoting Nthe Lie algebra genera<strong>to</strong>r conjugate <strong>to</strong> θ, we have from the above the vec<strong>to</strong>r fieldand actions:)(1α ıN = ∂∂θ | 0 = p 1 ∂∂p + 1 − e −2λp0− λ(p 1 ) 2 ∂0 2 λ∂p 1p 0 ⊳N =−ı ∂p0′∂θ | 0 =−ıp 1 , p 1 ⊳N =−ı ∂p1′∂θ | 0 =− ı − e−2λp0(1 − λ(p 1 ) 2 )2 λwhere the action ⊳ flips <strong>to</strong> the other way because θ is really a coordinate functionon SO 1,1 now being evaluated against N. A right-handed cross product by thisaction gives the relations)(1[p 0 , N] =−ıp 1 , [p 1 , N] =− ı − e −2λp0− λ(p 1 ) 2 .2 λSimilarly differentiating the action (24.22) on θ at θ = 0 gives the action ofan element of R>⊳R on N, which we view equivalently as a coaction L of thecoordinate algebra in algebraic terms, <strong>to</strong> find,(p 0 , p 1 )⊲N = e −λp0 N ⇒ L (N) = e −λp0 ⊗ Nwhich yields the coproduct and resulting antipodeN = N ⊗ 1 + e −λp0 ⊗ N,SN =−e λp0 N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!