12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 T. Bankswe have postulated are the analog of the Dirac–Schwinger commutation relationsfor the Wheeler–DeWitt opera<strong>to</strong>r in canonical approaches <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>.There is, at the present time, only one known solution <strong>to</strong> these conditions. Ifwe insist that the time dependent Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian of a given observer, is chosen independentlyat each instant from a certain random ensemble [18], 10 and choose theoverlap so that O(x, y, t) = H(x, t − D), where D is the minimal lattice pathlength between x and y, then all the consistency conditions are satisfied, and all thescaling relations of the flat FRW space-time with equation of state p = ρ are satisfiedby this rather explicit quantum system. This is the correct quantum descriptionof the dense black hole fluid that was postulated in [19; 20; 21]. By construction, itis a cosmology that saturates the covariant entropy bound at all times.The heuristic picture of a dense black hole fluid is based on the idea that at anygiven time, all the degrees of freedom in a horizon volume have coalesced <strong>to</strong> forma single black hole. An instantaneous distribution of black holes at relative separationsof order of their Schwarzschild radii, have the energy/entropy relation of ap = ρ fluid. If they continually coalesce <strong>to</strong> make larger, horizon filling black holes,always separated by about a horizon scale, then we indeed have an equilibrium systemwith equation of state p = ρ. The random Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian model described in theprevious paragraph is an explicit quantum system which has many of the propertiesderived from this heuristic picture.The concept of an observer does not make sense in the p = ρ background,because all degrees of freedom in any causal diamond are always in intense interaction,and there are no isolated sub-systems with a large number of semi-classicalobservables. The idea of holographic cosmology is that the universe we live inbegan as close as possible <strong>to</strong> the p = ρ system, consistent with the observerphilicprinciple: it is the maximally entropic solution of the consistency conditions wehave outlined, which does not quickly collapse back in<strong>to</strong> the p = ρ phase, andallows for the existence of what we have called observers over very long time periods.Of course, we might want <strong>to</strong> strengthen our demands, and insist on some sor<strong>to</strong>f criterion that guaranteed the existence of intelligent living organisms – observersin the more colloquial sense. Such restrictions are fine as long as we do not makeclaims that go beyond our abilities <strong>to</strong> actually do the calculations involved in guaranteeingor ruling out life. It’s also obvious that we want <strong>to</strong> make the weakestassumptions of this kind that give correct answers. It may be that the SU(1, 2, 3)gauge group of the standard model is only explainable because it leads <strong>to</strong> the type10 The existence and nature of this ensemble is based on the properties of quadratic fermionic systems withrandom one body Hamil<strong>to</strong>nians. In this way, the choice of holographic pixels as the fundamental variables of<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>, enters directly in<strong>to</strong> the formulation of holographic cosmology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!