12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> phenomenologyG. AMELINO-CAMELIA22.1 The “<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> problem”, as seen by a phenomenologistThe “<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> problem” has been discussed for more than 70 years [1]assuming that no guidance could be obtained from experiments. But of course ifthere is <strong>to</strong> be a science of the <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> problem it must be treated justlike any other scientific problem, seeking desperately the guidance of experimentalfacts, and letting those facts take the lead in the development of new concepts. Wemust hope this works also for the <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> problem, or else abandon it <strong>to</strong>the appetites of philosophers.Unfortunately it is not unlikely that experiments might never give us any clearlead <strong>to</strong>ward <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>, especially if our intuition concerning the role of thetiny Planck length (∼ 10 −35 m) in setting the magnitude of the characteristic effectsof the new theory turns out <strong>to</strong> be correct. But even if the new effects were really sosmall we could still try <strong>to</strong> uncover experimentally some manifestations of <strong>Quantum</strong><strong>Gravity</strong>. This is hard, and there is no guarantee of success, but we must try.Our estimate that the <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> corrections should be very small in lowenergyexperiments is based on our experience with other similar situations; in fact,we expect that the Planck scale, since it is the energy scale where the current theoriesappear <strong>to</strong> break down, should also govern the magnitude of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>corrections <strong>to</strong> the analysis of processes involving particles with energies smallerthan the Planck scale. For example, in processes involving two particles both withenergy E the magnitude of the new effects should be set by some power of theratio between E and the Planck scale E p (∼ 10 28 eV). Since in all cases accessible<strong>to</strong> us experimentally E/E p is extremely small, this is a key challenge for <strong>Quantum</strong><strong>Gravity</strong> phenomenology. This is a challenge which, however, can be dealt with byrelying on experience with other analogous situations in physics. 11 As I emphasized elsewhere [2; 3], ongoing studies of pro<strong>to</strong>n stability from the grand unification perspectiveand early 1900s studies of Brownian motion could be characterized by a very similar challenge.<strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, ed. Daniele Oriti.Published by Cambridge University Press. c○ Cambridge University Press 2009.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!