12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prolegomena <strong>to</strong> any future <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 65causal set theory, causal dynamic triangulations, twis<strong>to</strong>r theory; and attempts <strong>to</strong>derive S-T structures as emerging from radically different underlying entities, suchas the symmetries of coherent states in quantum information theory (such theoriesare reviewed elsewhere in this volume). It is by no means certain that any of theconservative approaches will lead <strong>to</strong> a fruitful fusion of quantum theory and GR –indeed, it is even probable that they will not. But until some approach has beendeveloped leading <strong>to</strong> a consensus in the QG community, every approach deserves<strong>to</strong> be explored <strong>to</strong> its limits, if only <strong>to</strong> draw from the limited successes and ultimatefailure of each such attempt, lessons for the formulation of better alternativeapproaches.AcknowledgementsI thank Mihaela Iftime and Christian Wuthrich [38] for reading an earlier draft ofthis paper and each making several valuable suggestions for improvements adoptedin this version.References[1] A. Ashtekar, Asymp<strong>to</strong>tic Quantization (Naples, Bibliopolis, 1987).[2] A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: a statusreport,” (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404018 v1.[3] J. Baez, <strong>Quantum</strong> quandaries: a category-theoretic perspective, in D. P. Rickles,S. French and J. Saatsi, eds., Structural Foundations of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> (OxfordUniversity Press, 2006), pp. 240–265.[4] P. G. Bergmann and G. Smith, Measurability analysis for the linearized gravitationalfield, General Relativity and Gravitation 14 (1982), 1131–1166.[5] J. Bicák, The role of exact solutions of Einstein’s equations in the development ofGeneral Relativity, (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0004016 v1.[6] B. S. DeWitt, The quantization of geometry, in Louis Witten (ed.), Gravitation: AnIntroduction <strong>to</strong> Current Research, New York: J. Wiley and Sons, pp. 266-381 (1962).[7] B. S. DeWitt, The Global Approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> Field Theory, 2vols.(OxfordClarendon Press, 2003).[8] R. A. D’Inverno, J. Stachel , “Conformal two structure as the gravitational degrees offreedom in General Relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 19 (1978),2447–2460.[9] B. Dittrich, T. Thiemann, “Are the spectra of geometrical opera<strong>to</strong>rs in Loop<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> really discrete?” (2007), arxXiv:0708v2.[10] N. A. Doughty, Lagrangian Interaction/ An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Relativistic Symmetry inElectrodynamics and Gravitation (Reading, MA/Addison-Wesley, 1990).[11] J. Ehlers, F. A. E. Pirani, A. Schild, “The geometry of free fall and lightpropagation,” in General Relativity/Papers in Honor of J. L. Synge,L. O’Raifeartaigh, ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972) pp. 63–85.[12] H. Friedrich, A. Rendall, “The Cauchy problem for the Einstein equations” (2000),arXiv:gr-qc/0002074 v1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!