12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 N. Savvidou5.4 A spacetime approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> theory5.4.1 MotivationThe his<strong>to</strong>ries approach <strong>to</strong> General Relativity suggests a new, spacetime-focussed,approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>, characterized by two features that are not implementedin the existing <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> schemes.First, the Lorentzian metric is quantized, analogous <strong>to</strong> the ‘external’ quantumfield in the his<strong>to</strong>ry approach <strong>to</strong> scalar quantum field theory [22; 14]. This contrastswith conventional canonical <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> where only a spatial three-metricis quantised. Second, the his<strong>to</strong>ry scheme incorporates general covariance via amanifest representation of the spacetime diffeomorphism group.The canonical quantisation scheme was originally developed with the hope ofproviding a background independent formulation of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>. The generalprocedure involves (i) a 3 + 1 splitting of spacetime; (ii) the construction of asuitable Hilbert space <strong>to</strong> accommodate the basic kinematical quantities of the theory;and (iii) the definition of self-adjoint opera<strong>to</strong>rs that represent the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nianconstraints. The imposition of the constraints on the state vec<strong>to</strong>rs then projects outthe physical degrees of freedom.The canonical treatment of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> introduces a spacelike foliationthat enters the quantum description. However, the physical predictions should beindependent of the choice of this foliation. This is part of the famous ‘problem oftime’, as are attempts <strong>to</strong> understand the spacetime diffeomorphism group in thiscontext. These issues are significantly addressed by the his<strong>to</strong>ries formulation withits genuine spacetime description of physical quantities.The definition of the his<strong>to</strong>ry group provides the HPO formalism with a quantisationscheme that follows the general lore of canonical quantisation, providinghowever a fully covariant description – see for example the quantum treatment ofminisuperspace models in [3].The obvious technical problem in a his<strong>to</strong>ries-based quantisation is the rigorousimplementation of the dynamics by a his<strong>to</strong>ry analogue of the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nianconstraint opera<strong>to</strong>r. As in standard canonical theory, the classical expression isnon-quadratic – indeed non-polynomial – in the field variables, and so the constructionof an opera<strong>to</strong>r for the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian constraint seems a hopeless task usingconventional methods. For this reason, we intend <strong>to</strong> exploit the basic ideas of loopquantum gravity, which has been a promising approach for the construction thisopera<strong>to</strong>r.5.4.2 Towards a his<strong>to</strong>ries analogue of loop quantum gravityLoop quantum gravity is a successful canonical theory in many respects. The basicalgebra is defined with reference <strong>to</strong> objects that have support on loops in the threedimensionalsurface .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!