12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 J. Stachelproblem on a spacelike hypersurface (see [12]), the ten field equations split in<strong>to</strong>four constraints and six evolution equations. The ten components of the pseudometricprovide a very redundant description of the field, which as noted earlierhas only two degrees of freedom per S-T point. Isolation of these “true” degreesof freedom of the field is a highly non-trivial problem. One approach is <strong>to</strong> findsome kinematical structure, such that they may be identified with components ofthe metric tensor in a coordinate system adapted <strong>to</strong> this structure (see, e.g., the discussionin Section 4.6 of the conformal two-structure). Apart from some simplemodels (see Section 4.7), their complete isolation has not been achieved; but theprogram is still being pursued, especially using the Feynman approach (see, e.g.,[20]). Quantization of the theory may be attempted either after or before isolationof the true observables. In quantization methods before isolation, as in loop <strong>Quantum</strong><strong>Gravity</strong>, superfluous degrees of freedom are first quantized and then eliminatedvia the quantized constraints (see, e.g., [2]).Classical GR initial value problems can serve <strong>to</strong> determine various ways of definingcomplete (but generally redundant) sets of dynamical variables. Each problemrequires introduction of some non-dynamical structures for the definition of sucha set, which suggests the need <strong>to</strong> develop corresponding measurement procedures.The results also provide important clues about possible choices of variables forQG. These questions have been extensively studied for canonical quantization.One can use initial value formulations as a method of defining ensembles of classicalparticle trajec<strong>to</strong>ries, based on specification of half the maximal classical initialdata set at an initial (or final) time. The analogy between the probability of someoutcome of a process for such an ensemble and the corresponding Feynman probabilityamplitude (see, e.g., [31]) suggests a similar approach <strong>to</strong> field theories. InSection 4.2, this possibility was discussed for the loop formulation of electromagnetictheory. The possibility of a direct Feynman-type formulation of QG hasbeen suggested (see, e.g., [6; 7; 20]); and it has been investigated for connectionformulations of the theory, in particular for the Ashtekar loop variables. Reisenbergerand Rovelli [22; 23] maintain that: “Spin foam models are the path-integralcounterparts <strong>to</strong> loop-quantized canonical theories”. 21 These canonical methods ofcarrying out the transition from classical <strong>to</strong> quantum theory are based on Cauchyor spacelike hypersurface initial value problems (see Section 4.6.1). Another possiblestarting point for canonical quantization is the null-hypersurface initial valueproblem (see Section 4.6.1). Whether analogous canonical methods could bebased on two-plus-two initial value problems (see Section 4.6.2) remains <strong>to</strong> bestudied.21 See [3] for the analogy between spin foams in GR and processes in quantum theory: both are examples ofcobordisms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!