12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

134 F. MarkopoulouNote that completely positive maps between algebras go in the reverse direction<strong>to</strong> the edges of the graph. This is as usual for maps between states (forward) andbetween opera<strong>to</strong>rs (pullbacks).The above axioms ensure that the actual relations between the vertices of a givengraph are reflected in the opera<strong>to</strong>rs of the QCH. 3 Furthermore, as shown in [11], ifwe are given the CP maps on the edges, these axioms mean that unitary operationswill be found at the right places: interpolating between complete pairs. Whenξand ζ are a complete pair, we can regard the subgraph that interpolates between ξand ζ as the evolution of an isolated quantum system. We would expect that in thiscase the composite of the individual maps between ξ and ζ is unitary and indeedthe above axioms ensure that this is the case.9.2.1 Example: locally evolving networks of quantum systemsPossibly the most common objects that appear in background independent theoriesare networks. Network-based, instead of metric-based, theories are attractiveimplementations of the relational content of diffeomorphism invariance: it is theconnectivity of the network (relations between the constituents of the universe)that matter, not their distances or metric attributes. We shall use a very simplenetwork-based system as a concrete example of a QCH.We start with a network S of n = 1,...,N nodes, each with three edges attached<strong>to</strong> it, embedded in a <strong>to</strong>pological three-dimensional space (no metric on ). Thenetwork S is not <strong>to</strong> be confused with the graph Ɣ, it is changes of S that will giverise <strong>to</strong> Ɣ. A map from S <strong>to</strong> a quantum system can be made by associating a finitedimensionalstate space H n <strong>to</strong> each minimal piece of S, namely, one node and threeopen edges:H n = (9.4)Two such pieces of S with no overlap are unrelated and thus the state space of theentire network S is the tensor product over all the constituents,H S = ⊗ n∈SH n , (9.5)and the state space of the theory isH = ⊕ S iH Si , (9.6)3 Very interesting recent results of Livine and Terno [18] further analyze and constrain the allowed graphstructure <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account the quantum nature of the physical information flow represented.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!