12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Questions and answers 155causality if it is present at all. (So for example, it probably would not makesense <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> identify the causet nonlocality with the “violations of localcausality” manifested in the Aspect experiment.)• Q - L. Crane - <strong>to</strong> N. Savvidou:Do you know of any approach <strong>to</strong> the application of the his<strong>to</strong>ries picture <strong>to</strong>gravity which doesn’t assume a global spacelike foliation? Isn’t decoherence alocal process?– A-N.Savvidou:There is no paper yet treating foliations that are not globally spacelike. Itis, however, in principle possible <strong>to</strong> do so in the his<strong>to</strong>ries formalism. Onewould have <strong>to</strong> suitably redefine the foliation functional employed there. Forexample, in a spacetime that involves <strong>to</strong>pology change, the foliation functionalmay be defined with a dependence on the <strong>to</strong>pology of the spatialslice. The main problem in pursuing such an approach would be <strong>to</strong> ensurethe proper definability (and interpretation) of the canonical constraints. Concerningdecoherence: in the most general case decoherence refers <strong>to</strong> theprobabilistic behaviour of his<strong>to</strong>ries and as such it primarily refers <strong>to</strong> thestate of the quantum system (or the decoherence functional in the his<strong>to</strong>riesapproach). For this reason, it is a priori a global rather than a local concept.In my opinion, even decoherence from the environment cannot be said <strong>to</strong> bea local process, because it involves a separation in<strong>to</strong> system and environmentwhich is not given a priori (especially in cosmology). Moreover, in gravitythe true degrees of freedom are non-local functionals of the spacetime fields(because of the spatial diffeomorphism constraint) and in a theory of <strong>Quantum</strong><strong>Gravity</strong> even the definition of the notion of local process is problematic –at least before we know that a specific his<strong>to</strong>ry (4-metric) has been realized.• Q-J.Henson-<strong>to</strong>L.Crane:The contribution in this volume of Collins, Perez and Sudarsky calls for a“physical regularisation” of <strong>Quantum</strong> Field Theory on Minkowski space, meaningone that can be imposed without destroying the symmetries that we observeat low energies. Some discussion of this is also given in Sorkin’s contribution.Does the causal sites idea give new insights in this direction?– A-L.Crane:Causal sites are a new type of mathematical structure whose possibilities havenot been explored. I believe some of these possibilities are closely related <strong>to</strong>ideas arising from renormalization.One possibility I have been exploring is imposing a fixed <strong>to</strong>pologicaldimension via the condition that every cover of a site admit a refinement coverall of whose n + 2 fold intersections are empty. This is a well known propertyof n-manifolds. Call such a cover good.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!