12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

String theory, holography and <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 193of transformations than SO(d − 2). It is not reasonable <strong>to</strong> associate every linearcombination of S a (n) with pixels, or small areas on the holoscreen. Rather, weshould think of the discretization of the holoscreen <strong>to</strong>pology <strong>to</strong> occur through thereplacement of its algebra of functions with a finite dimensional algebra. Differentlinear combinations of the S a (k) correspond <strong>to</strong> opera<strong>to</strong>rs associated with differentbases of the finite function algebra. If the function algebra were abelian, we wouldhave a standard geometrical discretization of the surface (e.g. a triangulation ofa two surface) and we could choose a special basis for the algebra consisting offunctions which were non-vanishing on only a single pixel.At least in the case where we want <strong>to</strong> preserve exact continuous symmetries, 6this will lead us in<strong>to</strong> the simple case of non-commutative geometry, called fuzzygeometry. The function algebras for spherical holoscreens will be finite dimensionalmatrix algebras. Here the notion of a pixel is only an approximate one,similar <strong>to</strong> the localization of quantum Hall states within a Larmor radius of a point.If we go <strong>to</strong> the particular basis where S a (n) represents a single pixel, we see aconnection between this formalism and supersymmetry. The algebra of opera<strong>to</strong>rsfor a pixel is precisely the supersymmetry algebra for a massless supermultipletwith fixed momentum. We thus claim that the degrees of freedom specifying theorientation of a pixel on the holographic screen of a causal diamond are the states ofa massless superparticle which emerges from (or enters in<strong>to</strong>) the diamond throughthat pixel. In an asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat space, the limit of large causal diamonds shouldapproach null infinity. The number of degrees of freedom becomes infinite, and inparticular, we expect the pixel size <strong>to</strong> shrink <strong>to</strong> zero, relative <strong>to</strong> the area of theholoscreen. Thus, we should associate the pixel with a particular outgoing nulldirection (1,)at null infinity. We will see later that the overall scale of the masslessmomentum can also be encoded in the algebra of opera<strong>to</strong>rs. This observationis, I believe, an indication that the formalism au<strong>to</strong>matically generates supersymmetrictheories in asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat space. Indeed, when the SUSY algebra islarge enough <strong>to</strong> force us <strong>to</strong> include the gravitino in the multiplet, we already knowthat the dynamics must be exactly supersymmetric. The conjecture that all asymp<strong>to</strong>ticallyflat theories of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> must be Super Poincaré invariant is calledCosmological SUSY Breaking (CSB)[17].11.2 Dynamical constraintsThe time evolution opera<strong>to</strong>r describing dynamics for a given observer cannot be agauge invariant opera<strong>to</strong>r. In a generally covariant theory there cannot be a canonical6 If we are trying <strong>to</strong> model causal diamonds in a space-time with an asymp<strong>to</strong>tic symmetry group, it is reasonable<strong>to</strong> restrict attention <strong>to</strong> diamonds which are invariant under as much of that group as possible. Remember thatthe choice of finite causal diamonds is a gauge choice.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!