Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Spacetime symmetries in histories canonical gravity 83[13] C. J. Isham, & N. Linden, Continuous histories and the history group in generalisedquantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 5392.[14] C. J. Isham, & K. N. Savvidou, Quantising the foliation in history quantum fieldtheory, J. Math. Phys 43 (2002).[15] C. Isham, N. Linden, K. Savvidou, & S. Schreckenberg, Continuous time andconsistent histories. J. Math. Phys. 37 (1998) 2261.[16] K. Kuchar, The problem of time in canonical quantization. In Conceptual Problemsof Quantum Gravity, eds. A. Ashtekar & J. Stachel (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992)pp. 141–171.[17] R. Omnès, Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics: I Foundations. J. Stat.Phys. 53 (1998) 893.[18] R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press,Princeton, 1994).[19] J. Samuel, Is Barbero’s Hamiltonian formulation a gauge theory of Lorentziangravity? Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) L141.[20] J. Samuel, Canonical gravity, diffeomorphisms and objective histories. Class. Quant.Grav. 17 (2000) 4645.[21] K. N. Savvidou, The action operator in continuous time histories. J. Math. Phys. 40(1999) 5657.[22] K. N. Savvidou, Poincaré invariance for continuous-time histories. J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 3053.[23] K. N. Savvidou, General relativity histories theory II: Invariance groups. Class.Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 631.[24] K. N. Savvidou, General relativity histories theory I: The spacetime character of thecanonical description. Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 615.[25] K. N. Savvidou, Histories analogue of the general relativity connection formalism(in the press).[26] A. Sen, Gravity as a spin system. Phys. Lett. B119 (1982) 89–91.