12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170 G. Horowitz and J. Polchinskia nonlinear evolution equation for the coupling constants as measured at a givenenergy scale. 1In order <strong>to</strong> make this precise, it is useful <strong>to</strong> go <strong>to</strong> certain limits in which thefive-dimensional picture becomes manifest; we will later return <strong>to</strong> the more generalcase. Thus we consider four-dimensional gauge theories with the followingadditional properties.• Large N c . While the holographic principle implies a certain equivalence between fourandfive-dimensional theories, it is also true that in many senses a higher dimensionaltheory has more degrees of freedom; for example, the one-particle states are labeled byan additional momentum parameter. Thus, in order <strong>to</strong> find a fifth dimension of macroscopicsize, we need <strong>to</strong> consider gauge theories with many degrees of freedom. A naturallimit of this kind was identified by [20]: if we consider SU(N c ) gauge theories, thenthere is a smooth limit in which N c is taken large with the combination g 2 YM N c heldfixed.• Strong coupling. Classical Yang–Mills theory is certainly not the same as classical generalrelativity. If gravity is <strong>to</strong> emerge from gauge theory, we should expect that it willbe in the limit where the gauge fields are strongly quantum mechanical, and the gravitationaldegrees of freedom arise as effective classical fields. Thus we must consider thetheory with large ’t Hooft parameter g 2 YM N c.• Supersymmetry. This is a more technical assumption, but it is a natural corollary <strong>to</strong> theprevious one. <strong>Quantum</strong> field theories at strong coupling are prone <strong>to</strong> severe instabilities;for example, particle–antiparticle pairs can appear spontaneously, and their negativepotential energy would exceed their positive rest and kinetic energies. Thus, QED witha fine structure constant much greater than 1 does not exist, even as an effective theory,because it immediately runs in<strong>to</strong> an instability in the ultraviolet (known as the Landaupole). The Thirring model provides a simple solvable illustration of the problem: it existsonly below a certain critical coupling [10]. Supersymmetric theories however have a naturalstability property, because the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian is the square of a Hermitean superchargeand so bounded below. Thus it is not surprising that most examples of field theories withinteresting strong coupling behavior (i.e. dualities) are supersymmetric. We will thereforestart by assuming supersymmetry, but after understanding this case we can workback <strong>to</strong> the nonsupersymmetric case.We begin with the most supersymmetric possibility, N = 4 SU(N c ) gaugetheory, meaning that there are four copies of the minimal D = 4 supersymmetryalgebra. The assumption of N = 4 supersymmetry has a useful bonus inthat the beta function vanishes, the coupling does not run. Most gauge theorieshave running couplings, so that the strong coupling required by the previous argumentpersists only in a very narrow range of energies, becoming weak on one sideand blowing up on the other. In the N = 4 gauge theory the coupling remains1 This locality was emphasized <strong>to</strong> us by Shenker, who credits it <strong>to</strong> Wilson.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!