12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 N. SavvidouWe start instead from the his<strong>to</strong>ries canonical General Relativity and we show thatthis formalism is augmented by a spacetime description that carries a representationof the Diff(M) group.In the standard canonical formalism we introduce a spacelike foliation E : R × → M on M, with respect <strong>to</strong> a fixed Lorentzian four-metric g. Then the spacelikecharacter of the foliation function implies that the pull-back of the four metric ona surface is a Riemannian metric with signature +++. In the his<strong>to</strong>ries theorywe obtain a path of such Riemannian metrics t ↦→ h ij (t, x), each one defined onacopyof t with the same t label. However, a foliation cannot be spacelike withrespect <strong>to</strong> all metrics g and in general, for an arbitrary metric g the pullback of ametric E ∗ g is not a Riemannian metric on .This point reflects a major conceptual problem of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>: the notionof ‘spacelike’ has no apriorimeaning in a theory in which the metric is a nondeterministicdynamical variable; in the absence of deterministic dynamics, therelation between canonical and covariant variables appears rather puzzling. In<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>, especially, where one expects metric fluctuations the notion ofspacelikeness is problematic.In his<strong>to</strong>ries theory this problem is addressed by introducing the notion of a metricdependent foliation E[·], defined as a map E[g] :LRiem(M) ↦→ FolM, thatassigns <strong>to</strong> each Lorentzian metric a foliation that is always spacelike with respect<strong>to</strong> that metric. Then we use the metric dependent foliation E[g] <strong>to</strong> define the canonicaldecomposition of the metric g with respect <strong>to</strong> the canonical three-metric h ij ,the lapse function N and the shift vec<strong>to</strong>r N i .Definedinthiswayh ij is always aRiemannian metric, with the correct signature. In the his<strong>to</strong>ries theory therefore, the3 + 1 decomposition preserves the spacetime character of the canonical variables,a feature that we expect <strong>to</strong> hold in a theory of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>.The introduction of the metric-dependent foliation allows the expression of thesymplectic form in an equivalent canonical form, on the space of canonical GeneralRelativity his<strong>to</strong>ries description can , by introducing conjugate momenta forthe three-metric π ij , for the lapse function p and for the shift vec<strong>to</strong>r p i . Thus weprove that there exists an equivalence between the covariant his<strong>to</strong>ry space covand the space of paths on the canonical phase space can =× t (T ∗ Riem( t ) ×T ∗ Vec( t ) × T ∗ C ∞ ( t )), where Riem( t ) is the space of all Riemannian threemetricson the surface t , Vec( t ) is the space of all vec<strong>to</strong>r fields on t ,andC ∞ ( t ) is the space of all smooth scalar functions on t .Canonical descriptionThe canonical his<strong>to</strong>ry space of General Relativity can is a suitable subset of theCartesian product of copies of the phase space Ɣ of standard canonical General

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!