12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

520 F. Girellithe Legendre transform, which is in general hard <strong>to</strong> invert, if not by perturbationsin M P :dx μds =ẋ μ = λ{x μ , E 2 − m 2 − p 2 dp μ− F(p,μ,M P )},ds = 0.The Lagrangian L then obtained will be in general a non-bilinear functionF(ẋ) of ẋ μ ,∫S = F(ẋ)ds.The key feature is that it is still time reparametrization invariant so that upon rescalingof the vec<strong>to</strong>r ẋ → aẋ, wehaveF(aẋ) =|a|F(ẋ). 12 This means that F can beidentified with a norm (pseudo-norm if the kernel of F is not trivial). The particlelives then in a space the metric of which is given byg μν (ẋ) = 1 ∂F 22 ∂ẋ μ ∂ẋ . νThis is a Finsler metric [30] and is the natural generalization of Riemannian metrics:the latter arises from a norm which is a bilinear form on the tangent space,whereas a Finsler metric arises from general normsF riem (x, ẋ) = g μν (x)ẋ μ ẋ ν F fins (x, ẋ) = g μν (x, ẋ)ẋ μ ẋ ν .All the geometrical objects (curvature, Killing vec<strong>to</strong>rs) arising in Riemanniangeometry have been generalized by mathematicians <strong>to</strong> the Finsler case, thoughoften with some ambiguities. In particular the notion of tetrad becomes here clearlyvec<strong>to</strong>r dependent, as proposed in the previous section. What is left now is <strong>to</strong> explorethis new concept of geometry, and <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> understand how these mathematicalstructures can provide a better understanding of the semiclassical spacetimes, butalso <strong>to</strong> possible new experimental tests.A key feature of this approach is <strong>to</strong> keep the usual notion of tangent bundle, as avec<strong>to</strong>r bundle. Another possible interpretation of the MDR is <strong>to</strong> say that momentumspace is curved, so that we lose the vec<strong>to</strong>r bundle structure for the tangent bundle.This is the standard interpretation of DSR.26.3.2.2 Extended phase spaceThe choice of symplectic structure and therefore the choice of physical configurationcoordinates was pretty arbitrary in the previous section. It is natural <strong>to</strong> ask ifone can have some canonical way <strong>to</strong> derive the full (non-trivial) phase space. Forthis it would be convenient <strong>to</strong> construct a linear momentum in some space, definethe canonical conjugated configuration coordinates and inverse the map <strong>to</strong> recover12 The homogeneity might be true only for a > 0 in which case the MDR is not invariant under time inversion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!