12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Categorical geometry and the mathematical foundations of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 97The idea of constructing a <strong>to</strong>pos version of the BC model using decoherent his<strong>to</strong>riesalso points <strong>to</strong> a BC model which varies depending on which classical observerthe model is observed by.Both of these ideas (neither implemented yet, and neither easy) seem <strong>to</strong> hint ata simultaneously higher categorical and <strong>to</strong>pos theoretical description of quantumspacetime which would fulfill the physical idea of a relational spacetime.Perhaps there is an as yet un-guessed construction of a 2-stack which will providea synthesis of these ideas. Einstein’s relational ideas may find their final formin the mathematical ideas of Grothendieck.AcknowledgementsThe idea of <strong>to</strong>pos theory arising in quantum theory in general and <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>in particular is something I learned from Chris Isham. Much of the higher categorytheory in this paper was strongly influenced by working with Dan Christensen duringmy visit <strong>to</strong> the University of Western Ontario. I learned about Grothendieck’swork during my visit <strong>to</strong> Montpellier where I was invited by Philippe Roche. I benefitedfrom conversations about <strong>to</strong>pos theory with Carlos Con<strong>to</strong>u-Carrere while Iwas there. I also had many interesting conversations with Marni Sheppeard at bothplaces. The BC model, of course, is joint work with John Barrett. This work issupported by a grant from FQXi.References[1] S. Maclane, Categories for the Working Mathematician (Springer Verlag, NY, 1971).[2] M. P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, Space time as a Feynman diagram: theconnection formulation, Class. <strong>Quantum</strong> Grav. 18 (2001) 121–140.[3] M. Artin, Theorie des <strong>to</strong>pos et cohomologie etale des schemas (Springer, Berlin,NY, 1972).[4] S. Maclane and I. Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic, a First Introduction <strong>to</strong>Topos Theory (Springer, NY, 1992).[5] A. Kock, Synthetic Differential Geometry (Cambridge University Press, 1981).[6] J. Benabou, Introduction <strong>to</strong> bi-categories, in Reports of the midwest category theoryseminar, LNM 47 (Springer, 1967), pp. 1–77.[7] P. Goerss and R. Jardine, Simplicial Homo<strong>to</strong>py Theory (Birkhauser, 1999).[8] L. Breem, On the Classification of 2-Gerbes and 2-Stacks, Societe Mathematiquede France (Providence RI, 1994).[9] R. Street, Cosmoi of Internal Categories, AMS Transactions (1980).[10] R. Picken, A cohomological description of abelian bundles and gerbes, inProceedings XXth workshop on geometric methods in physics, Bielowieza, July 1–7,2001.[11] J. Baez and J. Dolan, Higher Yang–Mills theory, hep-th/0206130.[12] J. Barrett and L. Crane, Relativistic spin networks and quantum gravity, J. Math.Phys. 39 (1998) 3296–3302.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!