12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Doubly special relativity 495DSR <strong>to</strong> deformed Special Relativity. But of course, deformation requires a deformationscale, so even semantically both terms are just equivalent, just stressingdifferent aspects of DSR. Note that in addition <strong>to</strong> the modified, deformed algebra ofspacetime symmetries, like the one in eq. (25.1), the theory is <strong>to</strong> be equipped withan additional structure(s), so as <strong>to</strong> make sure that its algebra cannot be reduced <strong>to</strong>the standard algebra of spacetime symmetries of Special Relativity, by rearrangemen<strong>to</strong>f genera<strong>to</strong>rs. Only in such a case DSR will be physically different fromSpecial Relativity.In the framework of DSR we want <strong>to</strong> understand if there are any modifications<strong>to</strong> the standard particle kinematics as described by Special Relativity, at very highenergies, of order of Planck scale. The motivation is both phenomenological andtheoretical. First there are indications from observations of cosmic rays carryingenergy higher than the GZK cu<strong>to</strong>ff that the standard special relativistic kinematicsmight be not an appropriate description of particle scatterings at energies of orderof 10 20 eV (in the labora<strong>to</strong>ry frame). Similar phenomenon, the violation of thecorresponding cu<strong>to</strong>ff predicted by the standard special relativistic kinematics forultra-high energy pho<strong>to</strong>ns seems also <strong>to</strong> be observed. It should be noted, however,that in both these cases we do not really control yet all the relevant astrophysicaldetails of the processes involved (for example in the case of cosmic rays we do notreally know what are the sources, though it it is hard <strong>to</strong> believe that they are not atthe cosmological distances.) The extended discussion of these issues can be found,for example, in [1]. If violation of the GZK cu<strong>to</strong>ff is confirmed, and if indeed thesources are at the cosmological distances, this will presumably indicate deviationfrom Lorentz kinematics. One of the major goals of DSR is <strong>to</strong> work out robust theoreticalpredictions concerning the magnitude of such effects. I will briefly discussthe “DSR phenomenology” below.25.2 <strong>Gravity</strong> as the origin of DSRThe idea of DSR arose from the desire <strong>to</strong> describe possible deviations from thestandard Lorentz kinematics on the one hand and, contrary <strong>to</strong> the Lorentz breakingschemes, <strong>to</strong> preserve the most sacred principle of physics – the Relativity Principle.Originally the view was that one may be forced by phenomenological data<strong>to</strong> replace Special Relativity by DSR, and then, on the basis of the latter oneshould construct its curved space extension, “doubly general relativity”. Then itwas realized that, in fact, the situation is likely <strong>to</strong> be quite opposite: DSR mightbe the correct flat space limit of gravity coupled <strong>to</strong> particles (see [5] and[8]). Weare thus facing the fundamental theoretical question: is Special Relativity indeed,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!