12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

204 T. BanksThus, there are of order (RM P ) 3/2 field theoretic degrees of freedom in a horizonvolume. If the field theory has a particle description this corresponds <strong>to</strong> of order(RM P ) 3/2 particles.This description gets the counting right, but conflicts with the experimental factthat we can excite momenta much higher than this cut off in the labora<strong>to</strong>ry. We willsee that the fermionic pixel variables suggest a more flexible way for the particleinterpretation <strong>to</strong> emerge from the formalism.We should also note that, although we will continue <strong>to</strong> concentrate on thedescription appropriate <strong>to</strong> a given causal diamond, this estimate allows us <strong>to</strong> understandhow the global coordinate description of dS space might emerge in the largeR limit. The <strong>to</strong>tal entropy of dS space is of order (RM P ) 2 . This means that there areenough degrees of freedom <strong>to</strong> account for (RM P ) 1/2 commuting copies of the fieldtheory variables allowed in a given horizon volume. In global coordinates, at earlyand late times, the number of independent horizon volumes seems <strong>to</strong> grow withoutbound. However, if we imagine filling each of those volumes with a generic fieldtheoretic state, then the extrapolation in<strong>to</strong> either the past or the future leads <strong>to</strong> aspace-like singularity before the minimal volume sphere is reached. We interpretthis as saying that the general field theoretic state in very late or very early timedS space, does not correspond <strong>to</strong> a state in the quantum theory of dS space. Onlywhen the absolute value of the global time is small enough that there are at√most(RM P ) 1/2 Mhorizon volumes, does a generic field theory state (with cut-off PR )correspond <strong>to</strong> a state in <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>. At later times, most horizon volumesmust be empty. As RM P → ∞, these restrictions become less important. Theconventional formalism of quantum field theory in dS space is the singular limitRM P →∞with R kept finite in units of particle masses. If particle masses inPlanck units do not approach constant values at RM P →∞, then this limit doesnot make any sense. In particular, if SUSY is res<strong>to</strong>red in this limit, the splittings insupermultiplets do not approach constant values.Here is the way <strong>to</strong> reproduce the field theory state counting in terms of fermionicpixel variables. Write the fermionic matrix in terms of blocks of size M × M + kwith k = 0, 1andM ∼ √ N. The states in a given horizon volume are associatedwith fermionic variables along a block diagonal, as follows⎛⎞1 2 3 ... MM 1 2 ... M − 1M − 1 M 1 ... M − 2... ... ... ... ....... ... ... ... ...⎜⎟⎝ 3 4 5 ... 2 ⎠2 3 4 ... 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!