12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Loop quantum gravity 245will play the role of labelling smearing functions. Furthermore, let k be an su(2)valued, smooth function on . We define holonomy and flux functions∫∫A(s) := P exp( A), E k (S) := Tr(k ∗ E) (13.13)pwhere ∗E is the metric independent, pseudo-two form dual <strong>to</strong> E. Now consideran arbitrary, finite collection of paths s. Their union forms a finite 10 graph γ andwe may compose the paths s from the edges of the resulting graph. We now calla function cylindrical over a graph provided it is a complex valued function of theA(s) where s runs through the edges of the graph. The cylindrical functions form anAbelean ∗ -algebra which we denote by Cyl. Next, denote by Y k,S the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nianvec<strong>to</strong>r field of E k (S).ThenP is defined as the Lie algebra of cylindrical functionsf and vec<strong>to</strong>r fields v equipped with the following Lie bracket [( f,v),(f ′ ,v ′ )]=(v[ f ′ ]−v ′ [ f ], [v, v ′ ]). The most important building block in that algebra isY k,S [A(s)] ={E k,S , A(s)} =ικ A(s 1 )k(s ∩ S)A(s 2 ) (13.14)where s = s 1 ◦s 2 and we have assumed that s ∩ S is precisely one point, the generalcase being similar.13.3.1.1 The quantum algebra A and its representationsThe corresponding A is defined by formally following the procedure of section13.2. We now consider its representation theory. Since we are dealing with afield theory the representation theory of A will be very rich so we have <strong>to</strong> downsizeit by imposing additional physical requirements. The natural requirement isthat the representation derives from a state invariant under the au<strong>to</strong>morphisms ofthe bundle P. Locally these au<strong>to</strong>morphisms can be identified with the semidirectproduct G := G ⋊ Diff() of local SU(2) gauge transformations and spatial diffeomorphisms.The requirement of G-invariance is natural because both groupsare generated canonically, that is by the exponential of the respective Hamil<strong>to</strong>nianvec<strong>to</strong>r fields, from the Gauss constraint and spatial diffeomorphism constraintrespectively.ForinstancewehavewithC() = ∫ ∫ d3 x j C j and C( ⃗N) =d3 xN a C a thatα g (A(s)) := exp(X C() ) · A(s) = g (b(s)A(s)g ( f (s))α ϕ (A(s)) := exp(X N ⃗ C( ⃗N) ) · A(s) = A(ϕ ⃗N(s)), (13.15)where g = exp() and ϕN ⃗ is the diffeomorphism defined by the integralcurves of the vec<strong>to</strong>r field ⃗N. Here, b(s), f (s) respectively denote beginning andfinal point of the path s and X F denotes the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian vec<strong>to</strong>r field of F.S10 Technically paths and surfaces must be semi-analytic and compactly supported in order for that <strong>to</strong> be true[1; 2; 21] but we will not go in<strong>to</strong> these details here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!