12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 N. SavvidouRelation between the invariance groupsOne of the deepest issues <strong>to</strong> be addressed in canonical gravity is the relation ofthe algebra of constraints <strong>to</strong> the spacetime diffeomorphisms group. The canonicalconstraints depend on the 3 + 1 decomposition and hence on the foliation.The equivariance condition manifests a striking result both in its simplicity andits implications: the action of the spacetime Diff(M) group preserves the set of theconstraints, in the sense that it transforms a constraint in<strong>to</strong> another of the same typebut of different argument. Hence, the choice of an equivariance foliation implementsthat his<strong>to</strong>ries canonical field variables related by spacetime diffeomorphismsare physically equivalent. Furthermore this result means also that the group Diff(M)is represented in the space of the true degrees of freedom. Conversely, the space oftrue degrees of freedom is invariant under Diff(M).Hence, the requirement of the physical equivalence of different choices of timedirection is satisfied by means of the equivariance condition.5.3.3 Reduced state spaceGeneral Relativity is a parameterised system in the sense that it has vanishingHamil<strong>to</strong>nian on the reduced phase space due <strong>to</strong> the presence of first classconstraints.In the his<strong>to</strong>ries framework we define the his<strong>to</strong>ry constraint surface C h ={t ↦→ C, t ∈ R} as the space of maps from the real line <strong>to</strong> the single-time constraintsurface C of canonical General Relativity. The reduced state space is obtainedas the quotient of the his<strong>to</strong>ry constraint surface, with respect <strong>to</strong> the action of theconstraints.The Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian constraint is defined as H κ = ∫ dt κ(t)h t , where h t :=h(x t , p t ) is first-class constraint. For all values of the smearing function κ(t),the his<strong>to</strong>ry Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian constraint H κ generates canonical transformations on thehis<strong>to</strong>ry constraint surface.It has been shown [23; 24] that the his<strong>to</strong>ry reduced state space red is a symplecticmanifold that can be identified with the space of paths on the canonical reducedstate space red ={t ↦→Ɣ red , t ∈ R}. Therefore the his<strong>to</strong>ries reduced state space isidentical <strong>to</strong> the space of paths on the canonical reduced state space. Consequentlythe time parameter t also exists on red , and the notion of time ordering remainson the space of the true degrees of freedom. This last result is in contrast <strong>to</strong> thestandard canonical theory where there exists ambiguity with respect <strong>to</strong> the notionof time after reduction.Moreover, the action functional S commutes weakly with the constraints, so itcan be projected on the reduced state space. It then serves its role in determiningthe equations of motion [23; 24].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!