12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248 T. Thiemannthat Ĉ(N) cannot be defined on H Diff because it must not leave that space invariantin any non-anomalous representation. Now consider the Master constraint∫M := d 3 C 2x √ . (13.20)|det(E)|Owing <strong>to</strong> the judicious choice of the “matrix” K ∝|det(E)| −1/2 the function M isspatially diffeomorphism invariant. It therefore can be represented directly on theHilbert space H Diff and can be solved by the direct integral method of the previoussubsection.Thus we arrive at the physical Hilbert space H Phys , which, however, is ratherimplicitly defined via the spectral resolution of the opera<strong>to</strong>r ̂M. The opera<strong>to</strong>r ̂Mis rather complicated as one might expect and hence its spectrum cannot be determinedin closed form, although simple, normalisable (in the inner product of H Diff )solutions are already known.13.3.2 Outstanding problems and further resultsIn the previous subsection we have restricted our attention <strong>to</strong> the gravitationaldegrees of freedom but similar results also hold for the matter content of the (supersymmetricextension of) the standard model. In order <strong>to</strong> perform calculations ofphysical interest and <strong>to</strong> make contact with the well established framework of QFTon curved spacetimes (e.g. the physics of the standard model at large physicalscales) it is manda<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong> develop approximation schemes both for the physicalinner product and for the Dirac observables that are in principle available as displayedin section 13.2. Also it is possible that what we have arrived at is a theorywhose classical limit is not GR but rather a completely different sec<strong>to</strong>r, similar <strong>to</strong>the different phases that one can get in statistical physics or Euclidean QFT. Henceit is necessary <strong>to</strong> develop semiclassical <strong>to</strong>ols in order <strong>to</strong> establish the correct classicallimit. There is work in progress on both fronts: the spin foam models [33] thathave been intensively studied can be viewed as avenues <strong>to</strong>wards approximationschemes for the physical inner product. Furthermore, coherent (minimal uncertainty)states for background independent theories of connections have alreadybeen constructed at the level of H Kin [34; 35; 36; 37; 38; 39; 40; 41] and onenow has <strong>to</strong> lift them <strong>to</strong> the level of H Diff and H Phys respectively.Next, within LQG it has been possible <strong>to</strong> identify a black hole sec<strong>to</strong>r [42]which encompasses all black holes of astrophysical interest (Schwarzschild–Reissner–Nordstrom–Kerr–Newman family) and a careful analysis has identifiedthe microscopic origin of the black hole entropy as punctures of the knots labellingphysical states (plus the labels D) with the horizon. The entropy counting for largeblack holes results in the Bekenstein–Hawking value if the parameter ι assumes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!