12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prolegomena <strong>to</strong> any future <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 574.5.2 Non-dynamical structures and differential concomitantsGR is a covariant or diffeomorphism-invariant theory, this invariance being definedas invariance under the group of active point diffeomorphisms of the underlyingmanifold. 22 It is also generally covariant, meaning there are no additional intrinsic,non-dynamical background S-T structures in the theory. Such non-dynamicalstructures as fibrations and foliations of the manifold, subsequently introducedin order <strong>to</strong> formulate initial value problems for the dynamical variables shouldbe introduced by means of geometrical, coordinate-independent, definitions. Inparticular, evolution of the dynamical variables should not involve the introductionof a preferred “global time” coordinate. 23 The dynamical fields include thepseudo-metric and inertio-gravitational connection, and any structures abstractedfrom them (see Section 4.3), so any differential opera<strong>to</strong>r introduced <strong>to</strong> describetheir evolution should be independent of metric and connection. 24 In other wordsthese opera<strong>to</strong>rs should be differential concomitants of the dynamical variables andany non-dynamical structures introduced. 25 The ones most commonly used are theLie derivatives L v of geometric objects with respect <strong>to</strong> a vec<strong>to</strong>r field v, andthe exterior derivatives dω of p-forms ω (see, e.g., [36], Chapter 2). 26 Variouscombinations and generalizations of both, such as the Schouten–Nijenhuis andFrlicher–Nijenhuis brackets, have been – or could be – used in the formulationof various initial value problems.4.6 Congruences of subspaces and initial-value problems in GRInitial value problems in GR involve:(1) (a) choice of initial submanifold(s) and of complementary congruence(s) of subspaces,27 and (b) choice of differential concomitant(s) <strong>to</strong> describe the evolution ofthe initial submanifold(s) along the congruence of complementary subspaces;(2) (a) choice of a set of dynamical variables, usually related <strong>to</strong> the pseudo-metric and theaffine connection, and their split-up by projection on<strong>to</strong> the initial submanifold(s) andthe complementary subspace(s), and (b) choice of differential concomitants <strong>to</strong> describetheir evolution;22 It is trivially true that all physical results are independent of passive changes of the coordinate system.23 Subsequent introduction of a coordinate system adapted <strong>to</strong> some geometrical structure is often useful forcalculations. But coordinate-dependent descriptions of an initial value problem implicitly introduce thesestructures. But doing tacitly what should be done explicitly often creates confusion.24 If the conformal and projective structures are taken as primary dynamical variables, the opera<strong>to</strong>rs should beindependent of these structures.25 A differential concomitant of a set of geometric objects is a geometric object formed from algebraiccombinations of the objects in the set and their partial derivatives.26 Or, equivalently, the “curl” of a <strong>to</strong>tally antisymmetric covariant tensor and the “divergence” of its dualcontravariant tensor density.27 “Complementary” in the sense that the <strong>to</strong>tal tangent space at any point can be decomposed in<strong>to</strong> the sum of thetangent spaces of the initial sub-manifold and of the complementary subspace.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!