12.07.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Three-dimensional spin foam <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 297Note also that since Re G m ( j) =− 2κ2 sin mcos mχ j(h m ) we have that) (− Re( ˜G m (g)) = πδ(P 2 sin m2(g) − = 2κ 2 sin m )δκ 2 m (g), (16.18)cos mwhere δ m (g) is a distribution on SO(3) which fixes g <strong>to</strong> be in the conjugacy classlabelled by m:∫∫dgf(g)δ m (g) = dxf(xh m x −1 ).SO(3)SO(3)/U(1)This is is the Hadamard propaga<strong>to</strong>r.Using the character decomposition we can eventually re-write I (Ɣ) in terms ofthe {6 j} symbols:I (Ɣ) = ∑ ∏ ∏d je K je (h me ) ∏ { }je1 j e2 j e3. (16.19)j e3 j e5 j e6{ j e } e /∈Ɣ e∈Ɣ tThis expression makes clear that the insertion of particles on the graph Ɣ corresponds<strong>to</strong> computing the expectation value of an observable Om Ɣ ein the <strong>to</strong>pologicalstate sum:Om Ɣ e( j e ) = ∏ K je (h me ).de∈Ɣ jeOnce again, the <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> amplitude I (Ɣ) is purely algebraic and theNew<strong>to</strong>n constant G only appears as a unit in order <strong>to</strong> translate the algebraicquantities j, m in<strong>to</strong> the physical length l = jl P = jG and the physical mass˜m = mκ = θ/4πG. Note that in our derivation we have encountered no ambiguityin constructing the off-shell amplitudes, the final expression agrees with the oneproposed in ([4]) but differs with the one in ([14]).As in the vacuum case the amplitude (16.19) should be properly gauge fixed,this is done similarly by inserting in the expectation value the observable∏ δ je , je0 (16.20)(d j 0 e) 2e∈Twhere T is a tree <strong>to</strong>uching every vertex of which is not a vertex of Ɣ. Notethat we should not gauge fix vertices <strong>to</strong>uching Ɣ since now the gauge degrees offreedom at the location of Ɣ are dynamical entities corresponding <strong>to</strong> the particlelocation.The gauge fixed partition function I (Ɣ) can be shown <strong>to</strong> be independent of thetriangulation and the gauge fixing ([3]) and only depends on the <strong>to</strong>pology of(M,Ɣ). This means that we can trivially take the limit of infinitely fine triangulationsand that the Ponzano–Regge model corresponds <strong>to</strong> an effective continuumtheory even if it is originally described in terms of a discrete structure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!