SAFA Ramp Inspections - Code7700

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SAFA Ramp Inspection ProceduresGuidance materialInspectionItemStd. Cat. Std. ref. Standard’s Text Pre-described Finding PDFcode2010. The information notified therein shall not be changed further forat least another 28 days after the effective date, unless thecircumstance notified is of a temporary nature and would not persistfor the full period.A06 I 2 A6-I-6.2.3c An aeroplane shall carry:c) current and suitable charts to cover the route of the proposed flightand any route along which it is reasonable to expect that the flight maybe diverted.A15-6.1.1 Information concerning the circumstances listed in Appendix 4, Part 1,shall be distributed under the regulated system (AIRAC), i.e. basingestablishment, withdrawal or significant changes upon a series ofcommon effective dates at intervals of 28 days, including 14 January2010. The information notified therein shall not be changed further forat least another 28 days after the effective date, unless thecircumstance notified is of a temporary nature and would not persistfor the full period.Several sets of requiredinstrument charts available in theflight deck, of which one (not inuse)is out of dateA06-07Instructions forcompleting the detaileddescriptionrevision of the currentapplicable chartsIndicate: what charts are not upto date the date/number ofrevision of theinspected out of datechartsSAFA Coordination Section Page 52 of 217© European Aviation Safety Agency, 2012 V 2.0
SAFA Ramp Inspection ProceduresGuidance materialInspectionInspecting InstructionsItem Inspections Item TitleA07 Minimum Equipment List Check if the MEL is available.Note: An increasing number of operators do not have the MEL on board, but available via a data downlink. This should be considered asan acceptable alternative.Check if the MEL is not less restrictive than MMEL.Note: If it is found that the MEL does not incorporate the latest revision of the MMEL, this should be reported as a General Remark (cat. G).Note: Checking the revision status of the MEL might not be enough; in case the last revision introduced less restrictive conditions, the MELmight not have to be updated. A missing revision number is no reason to raise a finding; the document control process is to beagreed by the overseeing authority. If it is found that a MEL is not up to date resulting in a less restrictive document, questions maybe raised in the follow-up phase on the appropriate document control.Note: It takes time before more strict requirements introduced by a new MMEL will be implemented. Inspectors should allow a timeframe ofat least 4 months (since publication of the revised MMEL) for the revision of a MEL.Check if MEL content reflects actual equipment installed on the aircraft and takes into account the special approvals in the operationsspecifications. Check if the MEL contains the (M) maintenance and/or (O) operational procedures.Check if the MEL is fully customised. For example, the MEL should not contain a reference to regulatory material (“ATA 23 Communicationsystems – Any in excess of those required by 14 CFR may be inoperative provided it is not powered by Standby Bus and is not required foremergency procedures.”) but should mention the actual required number.Note: Mainly for passenger cabin related items, the number may be missing, provided that the MEL reflects an alternate means ofconfiguration control.Check if the deferred defects (if any) are in accordance with the MEL instructions.Note: Annex 6 does require that the MEL is approved by the State of Operator. However, the Annex 6 does not require that proof of suchapproval be contained in the MEL itself or has to be carried on board. It is up to each and every Contracting State to determine howthey approve a manual and whether evidence of such approval is required in the manual. The absence of a specific approval of theMEL on board of the aircraft does not constitute a finding.InspectionItemStd. Cat. Std. ref. Standard’s Text Pre-described Finding PDFcodeA07 I 2 A6-I-6.1.3 The operator shall include in the operations manual a minimumequipment list (MEL), approved by the State of the Operator which willenable the pilot-in-command to determine whether a flight may becommenced or continued from any intermediate stop should anyinstrument, equipment or systems become inoperative. Where the Stateof the Operator is not the State of Registry, the State of the OperatorMEL does not reflect aircraftconfiguration or the operationsspecificationsA07-01Instructions forcompleting the detaileddescriptionIndicate the particularsof the situationobservedSAFA Coordination Section Page 53 of 217© European Aviation Safety Agency, 2012 V 2.0
Page 1 and 2: European Aviation Safety AgencyEuro
Page 4 and 5: SAFA Ramp InspectionsGuidance mater
Page 32 and 33: SAFA Ramp Inspection ProceduresGuid
Page 102 and 103:
SAFA Ramp Inspection ProceduresGuid
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
show all

SAFA Ramp Inspections - Code7700

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?