13.07.2015 Views

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Spin polarisation of a disordered GaAs 2D electron gas in a strong in-planemagnetic fieldAn in-plane magnetic field couples to the spins of a 2Dsystem, and can thus be used to probe the impact of manybody effects on the ground state of the 2D electron gas (2-DEG). For example, the longitudinale resistance under parallelmagnetic field g<strong>en</strong>erally exhibits a saturation or a kinkfor a magnetic field B = B p signaling the complete spin polarizationof the 2D system [T. Okamoto et al., Phys. Rev.Lett. 82, 3875 (1999)].pres<strong>en</strong>t in disordered systems and should under no circumstancesbe interpreted as evid<strong>en</strong>ce for a ferromagnetic instability.Using high magnetic fields up to 32 T, we report on the particularlyrich parallel field physics occurring in 2D electrongas in GaAs, revealing an interplay betwe<strong>en</strong> these spin effects,disorder, and orbital effects. The magneto resistancekink usually associated with the 2-DEG complete spin polarizationis observed up to B p ∼ 30 T, and shifts down continuouslyon more than 20 T as the electron d<strong>en</strong>sity (andconsequ<strong>en</strong>tly mobility) is lowered in the sample (see figure37(a). This reduction of B p with decreasing electrond<strong>en</strong>sity is consist<strong>en</strong>t with the predicted electron-electron interaction<strong>en</strong>hancem<strong>en</strong>t of the spin susceptibility at low d<strong>en</strong>sity,favoring the 2-DEG polarization. However, the absolutevalue of B p remains 2-3 times smaller than the one calculatedat T = 0K for a disorder-free system, and extrapolatesto B p = 0 at a relatively “high” electron d<strong>en</strong>sity, wher<strong>en</strong>o ferromagnetic states have ever be<strong>en</strong> observed. We arguethis behaviour is due to the localization of electrons whichare subsequ<strong>en</strong>tly subtracted from the total free carrier d<strong>en</strong>sity[B.A. Piot et al. Phys. Rev. B 80, 115337 (2009)]. Inthis situation the Fermi sea appears effectively smaller andless magnetic field is required to fully polarize the system.This approach is motivated by the strong mobility dropmeasured as the electron d<strong>en</strong>sity is decreased in this veryregion. The temperature dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce of B p , which dep<strong>en</strong>dson the effective size of the Fermi sea, corresponds to thepolarization of a smaller Fermi sea, and indicates that thefraction of localized states increases as the electron d<strong>en</strong>sityis reduced. From this temperature behavior, a d<strong>en</strong>sity of delocalizedelectron can be estimated, and used to re-plot theexperim<strong>en</strong>tal B p of figure 37(b) (triangles), giving a betterquantitative agreem<strong>en</strong>t with theory.In summary, the magnetic field at which complete spin polarizationoccurs is dramatically reduced both by electronlocalization and electron-electron interaction <strong>en</strong>hanced atlow carrier d<strong>en</strong>sity. The large value of the extrapolatedcarrier d<strong>en</strong>sity for full spin polarization at zero magneticfield simply reflects the large number of localized electronsFigure 37: (a) Magneto resistance for differ<strong>en</strong>t electron d<strong>en</strong>sities.(b) Field associated with the complete spin polarization B pas a function of the electron d<strong>en</strong>sity (circles and squares), and asa function of the “corrected” electron d<strong>en</strong>sity (triangles). TheoreticalT = 0 K calculations of the magnetic field for full spin polarizationincluding many-body effects: Random Phase Approximation(RPA) [Y. Zhang and S. D. Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96,196602 (2006)], and Quantum Monte Carlo Calculation (QMC)[A. L. Subasi and B. Tanatar, Phys. Rev. B 78, 155304 (2008)].B.A. Piot, D. K. MaudeU. G<strong>en</strong>nser, A. Cavanna, D. Mailly (<strong>Laboratoire</strong> de Photonique et de Nanostructures, Marcoussis, France)30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!