13.07.2015 Views

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

Mise en page 1 - Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAGNETIC SYSTEMS 2009Magnetic properties of Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 (H, D) 4.2 compounds up to 35 TRFe 2 Laves phases can absorb hydrog<strong>en</strong> or deuterium upto 5H(D)/mol and this absorption modifies significantly thestructural, magnetic and electronic properties. The YFe 2 D xdeuteri<strong>des</strong> are ferromagnetic with an increase of the meanFe mom<strong>en</strong>t and a decrease of T C for x ≤ 3.5 D/mol. Forx = 4.2, the monoclinic compound is ferromagnetic at lowtemperature, th<strong>en</strong> undergoes a sharp first order magnetovolumictransition towards an antiferromagnetic structure at84 K. Surprisingly this transition is very s<strong>en</strong>sitive to the Hfor D substitution, which increases the mean Fe mom<strong>en</strong>t at4.2 K and shifts the transition temperature extrapolated atzero field T M0 to 131 K (by 50%). Since the cell volumeof the hydride is 0.78% larger than the deuteride, this giantisotope effect has be<strong>en</strong> related to the strong dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce ofthe itinerant electron metamagnetic behavior (IEM) behavioron the volume of one of the Fe sites among eight whichhas a differ<strong>en</strong>t number of H(D) neighbors.Thermomagnetization curves deduced from cooling underlow magnetic field (300 Oe) for Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 H 4.2 andY 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 D 4.2 respectively show sharp transitions atT MO = (107±2) K and (61±1) K respectively. These transitiontemperatures were found equal to 131 and 84 K inthe YFe 2 hydride and deuteride. The higher T MO valuefor the ferromagnetic YFe 2 H 4.2 hydride is attributed toa larger cell volume. However, in Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 H 4.2 andY 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 D 4.2 the exchange couplings betwe<strong>en</strong> the differ<strong>en</strong>tmagnetic atoms may also influ<strong>en</strong>ce the transitiontemperatures. This is confirmed by the thermomagnetizationcurves (figures 126 and 127) where a large increaseof T MO is observed together with a metamagnetic behavior.The transition field (HTR) is determined from themaximum of (dM T /dH). For Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 H 4.2 the transitionis observed in the 4.2 − 40 K and 125 − 175 K temperaturesranges On the contrary the transition exists inthe 4.2 − 55 K and 80 − 175 K temperature ranges forY 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 D 4.2 . In the 4.2 − 40 K range the (HTR) valuesare id<strong>en</strong>tical. However, wh<strong>en</strong> the temperature increasesa large isotopic effect is revealed by the temperature variationof HTR (figure 128).The transition field increases linearlyversus temperature but with a smaller HTR/T slopefor the deuteride (2.48 kOe/K) compared to the hydride(2.58 kOe/K). These values are nevertheless larger than forYFe 2 H 4.2 (1.34 kOe/K) and YFe 2 D 4.2 (1.37 kOe/K), showingan additional influ<strong>en</strong>ce of the Er substitution. This suggeststhat the Y for Er substitution modifies the structuraland magnetic properties of the hydri<strong>des</strong> and deuteri<strong>des</strong>: (i)The cell volume of the hydride is 0.8% larger than the correspondingdeuteride; (ii) A spin reori<strong>en</strong>tation of Er mom<strong>en</strong>tis induced at low temperature, indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>tly to the H/Disotope effect; (iii) The values of T M0 are smaller than inthe YFe 2 H 4.2 and YFe2D 4.2 compounds, but remain s<strong>en</strong>sitiveto the isotope influ<strong>en</strong>ce. The s<strong>en</strong>sitivity of T M0 to thechange of volume confirms the magnetovolumic characterof the transition. (iv) The B/T slopes are differ<strong>en</strong>t for thehydride and deuteri<strong>des</strong>, whereas there were similar in th<strong>en</strong>on substituted compounds.Figure 126: Thermomagnetization of Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 (H, D) 4.2 .Figure 127:D) 4.2 .Figure 128:Isothermal magnetization of Y 0.7 Er 0.3 Fe 2 (H,Transition field versus temperature.M. GuillotV. Paul-Boncour, T. Leblond (CMTR, ICMPE, CNRS and Univ. Paris XII, Thiais)90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!