2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSHigh field torque magnetometry on a molecular Dysprosium triangleLanthanide based molecular nanomagnets have be<strong>en</strong> attractingconsiderable att<strong>en</strong>tion due to their interesting magneticproperties. Mononuclear complexes of 4f ions haveshown slow relaxation of the magnetization at very hightemperatures compared to those observed in transition metals.Despite their out of phase ac signal observed above 40K, hysteresis curves were observed only at very low temperatures[Ishikawa et al., Angew. Chem. 117, 2991 (2005)].On cooling, deviations from the Arrh<strong>en</strong>ius law predictedfor single molecule magnet behavior become more important,which indicates that tunnelling plays a crucial role inthe relaxation of the magnetization. It is therefore of crucialimportance to obtain information on the low lying sublevelsof the 4f electronic systems, in order to understand the magnetism,and especially the relaxation mechanisms of thesecompounds.We have performed high field torque magnetometry measurem<strong>en</strong>tson the rec<strong>en</strong>tly investigated molecular Dy triangle[Luzon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 247205(2008)]. This compound shows an unpreced<strong>en</strong>ted magneticbehaviour having a non-magnetic ground doublet whichoriginates from the noncollinearity of the single-ion easyaxes of the Dy 3+ ions that lie in the plane of the triangleat 120 ◦ one from each other. This gives rise to a peculiarchiral nature of the ground nonmagnetic doublet and toslow relaxation of the magnetization which exhibits abruptaccelerations at the crossings of the discrete <strong>en</strong>ergy levels.The ground (|J = 15/2,m J = ±15/2〉) and the first excited(|J = 15/2,m J = ±13/2〉) doublets, were considered to <strong>des</strong>cribethe <strong>en</strong>ergy levels of the single ion assuming that theother excited states are very high in <strong>en</strong>ergy and do not contributeto the magnetic properties at low temperatures. Thesystem therefore mimics the behaviour of an S=3/2 spin.We have used the spin Hamiltonian approach to <strong>des</strong>cribethe low lying <strong>en</strong>ergy levels. The expression of the Hamiltonianused is,anisotropy in the system. The performed high field torquemeasurem<strong>en</strong>ts at 50 mK <strong>en</strong>abled us to quantify the crystalfield splitting betwe<strong>en</strong> the 15/2 and the 13/2 doubletsin Dy 3+ . Figure 109 (a) shows the measured torque signalat 50 mK up to 32 Tesla for the magnetic field applied atdiffer<strong>en</strong>t angles to the plane of the triangle. A peak in thetorque is evid<strong>en</strong>t at around 28 Tesla. Figure 109 (b) showsthe calculated torque signals for δ = 250 cm −1 , j = 0.064cm −1 , and g = 1.35 at 50 mK, which reproduce fairly wellthe experim<strong>en</strong>tally observed curves. The observed peak inthe torque signal at around 28 Tesla for transverse magneticfields points towards the high anisotropy in the system. Thecrystal field splitting of δ = 250 ± 10 cm −1 is close to thatexpected from previously performed ab initio calculations[Chibotaru et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4126 (2008)].In a more g<strong>en</strong>eral picture, this study has contributed to abetter understanding of lanthanide based systems. In particular,we have prov<strong>en</strong> that high field torque magnetometrycan be a good substitute to spectroscopy in systems whichare spectroscopically inactive.Ĥ = − j(Ŝ 1 · Ŝ 2 + Ŝ 2 · Ŝ 3 + Ŝ 3 · Ŝ 1 )− gµ B ∑ B · Ŝ i + δ oi=1,314 ∑ (( 15i=1,32 )2 − Ŝ 2 z i)(16)The first term is the isotropic exchange betwe<strong>en</strong> the Dy 3+ions, the second is the Zeeman term, and the last term<strong>des</strong>cribes the single-ion anisotropy where δ o is the zerofield splitting betwe<strong>en</strong> |J = 15/2,m J = ±15/2〉 and |J =15/2,m J = ±13/2〉 states of each Dy 3+ ion. We have particularychos<strong>en</strong> torque magnetometry as it is a strong tool toinvestigate the anisotropy in high-spin clusters, especiallyin systems which are not accessible by spectroscopy. Apeak in the torque signal occurs at a characteristic fieldwhich dep<strong>en</strong>ds on the temperature as well as the magneticFigure 109: (a) Torque signals for the magnetic field applied atdiffer<strong>en</strong>t angles close to 90 ◦ from the plane of the triangle at 50mK. (b) Similar calculated torque curves with the best fit parameters(δ = 250 cm −1 , j = 0.064 cm −1 , and g = 1.35). The temperatureand anisotropy dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t peak in the torque signal is evid<strong>en</strong>tat around 28 Tesla. The inset shows the molecular structure of theDy 3 cluster.A. B. Antunes, I. SheikinF. El Hallak, J. van Slager<strong>en</strong>, M. Dressel (University of Stuttgart, Germany), M. Eti<strong>en</strong>ne, J. Luzon, R. Sessoli (Universityof Flor<strong>en</strong>ce, Italy), C. Anson, A. Powell (University of Karlsruhe, Germany)81
MAGNETIC SYSTEMS 2009NMR evid<strong>en</strong>ce for long zero-quantum coher<strong>en</strong>ce in antiferromagneticmolecular wheels NaFe 6 and LiFe 6Molecular magnetic clusters of nanometer size have received<strong>en</strong>ormous attraction because of their spectacularquantum ph<strong>en</strong>om<strong>en</strong>a. A unique class of these clusters arethe antiferromagnetic (AFM) molecular wheels, in whichmagnetic metal ions are assembled in a ring-like structure.The dominant AFM Heis<strong>en</strong>berg interaction J betwe<strong>en</strong> themagnetic metal ions leads to a nonmagnetic S = 0 groundstate and a first excited S = 1 state in zero magnetic field.In strong magnetic fields the Zeeman splitting induces levelcrossings (LCs), where the ground state of the moleculechanges from S = 0, M = 0 to S = 1, M = −1, and furtherto S = 2, M = −2, etc. Due to the hyperfine couplingbetwe<strong>en</strong> the nuclear spin and the Fe III ions, the nuclear relaxationrate T −11is very s<strong>en</strong>sitive to the spin state and thespin dynamics of the ferric wheel. Most NMR studies havebe<strong>en</strong> carried out by means of 1 H NMR, since protons providea very strong signal, and their T −11is s<strong>en</strong>sitive to thedynamics of the Néel vector ⃗n = ∑ 6 i=1 (−1)i ⃗s i . However, amajor drawback is a huge amount of inequival<strong>en</strong>t protonson each ring complicating the analysis of the spin dynamics,especially around the level crossings. In order to overcomethis problem we performed NMR measurem<strong>en</strong>ts onthe nuclei which are located in a single-site position of highsymmetry, in the c<strong>en</strong>ter of the ferric wheel–here 23 Na or 7 Linuclei. Their hyperfine interaction is proportional to the totalspin of the ferric wheel ⃗S = ∑ 6 i=1 ⃗s i leading to importantdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces as far as T −11is concerned.Here we pres<strong>en</strong>t the first c<strong>en</strong>tral alkali NMR study atlow temperature and at high field, focusing on the magneticfield dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce at the level crossings [L. Schnelzeret al., submitted to EPL]. NMR measurem<strong>en</strong>ts on 23 Naand 7 Li nuclei were carried out on single crystals of [Na/Li⊂Fe 6 {N(CH 2 CH 2 O) 3 } 6 ]Cl·5CHCl 3·0.5H 2 O (Na/LiFe 6in short). They were performed in 17 and 20 T superconductingmagnets in Gr<strong>en</strong>oble and Karlsruhe. Single crystalswere mounted in the mixing chamber of a dilution refrigeratorfor very low temperatures and in pumped 4 He for measurem<strong>en</strong>tsat 2 K. Figure 110 shows the measured T −11ratesat 220 mK and 2 K. The low temperature measurem<strong>en</strong>ts ofNaFe 6 at 220 mK reveal a strong increase of T1 −1 towardsthe LC at 12 T. The LC is not characterized by an additional<strong>en</strong>hancem<strong>en</strong>t of T1 −1 as expected for proton NMR,but by a small reduction of T1 −1 (inset to figure 110a). Thisis attributed to the ins<strong>en</strong>sitivity of the c<strong>en</strong>tral alkali nucleito the fluctuations of the Néel vector. At 2 K T1 −1 shows abroad maximum around LC and, surprisingly, a reductionby three orders of magnitude of T −11in-betwe<strong>en</strong> the 1 st andthe 2 nd LC. Similar results have be<strong>en</strong> obtained for LiFe 6 ;plotted on a reduced field scale (B/J) the measurem<strong>en</strong>ts onLiFe 6 and NaFe 6 are almost id<strong>en</strong>tical. Measurem<strong>en</strong>ts of23 Na T1 −1 at the first LC, at temperatures down to 80 mK,reveal the exist<strong>en</strong>ce of a very small gap 0.06 K, in spiteof high symmetry of the molecule. This implies the exist<strong>en</strong>ceof a small perturbation reducing the symmetry of themolecule. The most striking ph<strong>en</strong>om<strong>en</strong>a is a spectaculardecrease by three orders of magnitude of T1 −1 occurring inthe middle betwe<strong>en</strong> the first and the second LC.The relaxation data have be<strong>en</strong> <strong>des</strong>cribed by calculating thecorresponding spectral d<strong>en</strong>sity of spin fluctuations by amethod of mom<strong>en</strong>ts. It turns out that the observed strongextinction of relaxation is not at all visible in the int<strong>en</strong>sity ofthe zero frequ<strong>en</strong>cy resonance (the zero mom<strong>en</strong>t), but is <strong>en</strong>tirelydue to its width, calculated as the second mom<strong>en</strong>t m 2 .For the calculation of m 2 we used the secular (i.e., <strong>en</strong>ergyconserving) part of the dipolar intermolecular interaction.Betwe<strong>en</strong> the first and the second LC there is a broad andvery deep minimum of m 2 . In this field range the groundstate is a S = 1 state whereas the first excited state changesfrom S = 0 to S = 2 through a broad anti-LC. Since theminimum of m 2 results from the balance of the matrix elem<strong>en</strong>tsof these states, it ext<strong>en</strong>ds over the same field range asthe anti-LC. It is remarkable that √ m 2 can become smallerby two orders of magnitude than the nuclear Larmor frequ<strong>en</strong>cy.This quite unusual situation leads to the reductionof T1 −1 by three orders of magnitude. One should also realizethat the correlation time τ c = 1/ √ m 2 corresponds tothat of a zero quantum coher<strong>en</strong>ce. τ c can be as long as ≃0.2 µs, which is very unusual for an electronic spin system.Figure 110: (a) Field dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce of 23 Na T1 −1 in NaFe 6 atT = 220 mK (white squares) and 2 K (black squares), and (b) 7 LiT1 −1 in LiFe 6 at T = 2 K (black squares) and 1 H T1 −1 (dots). Theresults of the calculations are giv<strong>en</strong> by solid lines. Inset displays azoom on the field dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce close to the LC at 220 mK.M. Horvatić, C. BerthierL. Schnelzer, B. Pilawa, M. Marz, H. von Löhneys<strong>en</strong> (Physikalisches Institut, Universität Karlsruhe,Germany)82
- Page 1 and 2:
LABORATOIRE NATIONAL DES CHAMPS MAG
- Page 4 and 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface 1Carbon Al
- Page 6 and 7:
Coexistence of closed orbit and qua
- Page 8:
2009PrefaceDear Reader,You have bef
- Page 12 and 13:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESInvestigation
- Page 14 and 15:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESPropagative L
- Page 16 and 17:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESEdge fingerpr
- Page 18 and 19:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESObservation o
- Page 20 and 21:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESImproving gra
- Page 22 and 23:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESHow perfect c
- Page 24 and 25:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESTuning the el
- Page 26 and 27:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESElectric fiel
- Page 28 and 29:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESMagnetotransp
- Page 30 and 31:
2009 CARBON ALLOTROPESGraphite from
- Page 32:
2009Two-Dimensional Electron Gas25
- Page 35 and 36:
TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Di
- Page 37 and 38: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Sp
- Page 39 and 40: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Cr
- Page 41 and 42: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Re
- Page 43 and 44: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009In
- Page 45 and 46: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Ho
- Page 47 and 48: TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON GAS 2009Te
- Page 50 and 51: 2009 SEMICONDUCTORS AND NANOSTRUCTU
- Page 52 and 53: 2009 SEMICONDUCTORS AND NANOSTRUCTU
- Page 54 and 55: 2009 SEMICONDUCTORS AND NANOSTRUCTU
- Page 56 and 57: 2009 SEMICONDUCTORS AND NANOSTRUCTU
- Page 58 and 59: 2009 SEMICONDUCTORS AND NANOSTRUCTU
- Page 60: 2009Metals, Superconductors and Str
- Page 63 and 64: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Anom
- Page 65 and 66: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Magn
- Page 67 and 68: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS ... 2009Coe
- Page 69 and 70: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS ... 2009Fie
- Page 71 and 72: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009High
- Page 73 and 74: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Angu
- Page 75 and 76: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Magn
- Page 77 and 78: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Meta
- Page 79 and 80: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 2009Temp
- Page 81 and 82: METALS, SUPERCONDUCTORS... 200974
- Page 84 and 85: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSY b 3+ → Er
- Page 86 and 87: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSMagnetotranspo
- Page 90 and 91: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSNuclear magnet
- Page 92 and 93: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSStructural ana
- Page 94 and 95: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSEnhancement ma
- Page 96 and 97: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSInvestigation
- Page 98 and 99: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSField-induced
- Page 100 and 101: 2009 MAGNETIC SYSTEMSMagnetic prope
- Page 102: 2009Biology, Chemistry and Soft Mat
- Page 105 and 106: BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY AND SOFT MATTER
- Page 108 and 109: 2009 APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITYMagne
- Page 110 and 111: 2009 APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITYPhtha
- Page 112: 2009Magneto-Science105
- Page 115 and 116: MAGNETO-SCIENCE 2009Study of the in
- Page 117 and 118: MAGNETO-SCIENCE 2009Magnetohydrodyn
- Page 119 and 120: MAGNETO-SCIENCE 2009112
- Page 122 and 123: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 124 and 125: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 126 and 127: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 128 and 129: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 130 and 131: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 132 and 133: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 134 and 135: 2009 MAGNET DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUM
- Page 136 and 137: 2009 PROPOSALSProposals for Magnet
- Page 138 and 139:
2009 PROPOSALSSpin-Jahn-Teller effe
- Page 140 and 141:
2009 PROPOSALSQuantum Oscillations
- Page 142 and 143:
2009 PROPOSALSThermoelectric tensor
- Page 144 and 145:
2009 PROPOSALSDr. EscoffierCyclotro
- Page 146 and 147:
2009 PROPOSALSHigh field magnetotra
- Page 148 and 149:
2009 THESESPhD Theses 20091. Nanot
- Page 150 and 151:
2009 PUBLICATIONS[21] O. Drachenko,
- Page 152 and 153:
2009 PUBLICATIONS[75] S. Nowak, T.
- Page 154 and 155:
Contributors of the LNCMI to the Pr
- Page 156 and 157:
Institut Jean Lamour, Nancy : 68Ins
- Page 158 and 159:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laborato