13.07.2015 Views

Flora of Ashdown Forest - Botanical Society of the British Isles

Flora of Ashdown Forest - Botanical Society of the British Isles

Flora of Ashdown Forest - Botanical Society of the British Isles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25Similarly, environmental variables can be correlated with species, as shown below:ENVIRONMENTALVARIABLEAncient woodlandCar parksChurchyard/cemeteryDisused railwayHeathlandMain urban areasMarsh/bogPlantationPond/lakeSemi-natural woodlandStream/riverAlluviumTunbridge Wells SandsWadhurst ClayCurtisden soilsPoundgate soilsWickham 1 soilsSPECIES WITH THE FIVE HIGHEST SIMILARITY CO-EFFICIENTS(SIMILARITY CO-EFFICIENTS IN BRACKETS)Wahlenbergia hederaeea (40), Rlbes rubrum (39), Carex laevigata (35),Veronica hederifolia (35), Hypericum tetrapterum (35).Euphrasia attic/naNs agg. (52), Ranunculus bu/bosus (44), Galiurn verum(43), Unum catharticum (42), Agrimonia eupatoria (41).Svmphoricarpos a/bus (65), Hypericum androsaemum (62), Reynoutriajaponica (49), Calvstegia silvatiea (47), Galanthus nivalis (45).Callitriche platycarpa (100), Chaenorhinum minus (99), Linaria vulgaris(99), Spiran<strong>the</strong>s spiralis (99), Rosa eanina x obtusifolius (99).Festuea filiformis (63), Juneus squarrosus (61), Erica tetralix (59), Ulexminor (58), Nardus strieta (53).Symphoricarpos rivu/aris (66), Equisetum arvense (51), Me/ica unit/ora(50), Reynoutria japonica (46), Veronica hederifolia (45).Salix rep ens (34), Carex eehinata (32), Salix aurita (29), Trichophorumeespitosum (28), Carex nigra (28).Senecio sy/vaticus (32), Mentha arvensis (31), Stellaria a/sine (30),Senecio vul9aris (27), Ca/litriche stagnalis (26).Lotus u/iginosus (52), Iris pseudacorus (52), Ma/us domestica (52), Carexsvlvatiea (50), Galium palustre (47).Fagus svlvatiea (100), Castanea sativa (99), Bleehnum spieant (97),Holeus mollis (97), Ajuga rep tans (96).Epilobium obscurum (66), Alnus glutinosa (63), Prunus avium (60), Carexsylvatiea (59), Glyeeria fluitans (59).Filipendula ulmaria (50), Scirpus svlvatieus (55), Festuea gigantea (49),Lycopus europaeus (47), Chrysosp/enium oppositifo/ium (46).Carpinus be tu/us (74), Me/ica unit/ora (69), Acer campestre (66), Luzulaforster! (64/, Atriplex patula (62).Acer campestre (57), Crataegus /aevigata (55), Carpinus betu/us (55),Chrvsosplenium oppositifolium (49), Meliea uniflora (49).Carex sv/vatica (51), Rosa arvensis (50), Lvchnis flos-cuculi (46), Prunusdomestiea (46), Arum maeulatum (45).Juncus squarrosus (61), Carex panicea (44), Carex echinata (43), Ribesni9rum (39/, Polvgala serpv//ifolia (38).Acer eampestre (82), Crataegus laevigata (81), Polyp odium agg. (81),Oenan<strong>the</strong> crocata (75), Luzu/a forsteri (71).5. Comparison with Sussex Plant AtlasThe Sussex Plant Atlas was recorded using tetrads between 1966 and 1978 (Hall 1980). It wasrecorded on an ad hoc basis with no standardisation in <strong>the</strong> recording, and thus provides a usefulcomparison with our data. For <strong>the</strong> comparison we have summarised our 1-km square data into <strong>the</strong> 14tetrads which directly correspond to <strong>the</strong> Sussex Plant At/as but also including tetrads 43A and 43V forwhich we have only recorded three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four 1-km squares.When <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> records for each tetrad were compared <strong>the</strong> results shown in <strong>the</strong> table belowwere obtained, We have recorded on average nearly half as many species again as <strong>the</strong> Sussex PlantAtlas, indicating that <strong>the</strong> Sussex Plant At/as was under-recorded. About 6.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species recordedin <strong>the</strong> Sussex Plant At/as were not recorded for our flora, indicating that more species could be found inour squares, Application <strong>of</strong> Dony's (1963, 1976) species-area relationship for Hertfordshire to our datasuggests that a mean <strong>of</strong> 223 species would be expected for each l-km square; we have recorded anaverage <strong>of</strong> 241 species per l-km square (excluding critical species) which suggests that Dony'sequation needs revising based on Sussex data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!