07.12.2012 Views

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9o j<br />

THREE-DIMENS~ONAL STUCTURE DETERMINATION OF DNA: [d(TAGCGCTA) ]~.<br />

Sophia ~ang , Marc Delsuc +, George Levy, Philip Borer and Stev~n<br />

LaPlante , NMR and Data Processing Laboratory, NIH Resource and<br />

Biophysics Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY13244-1200.<br />

+ICSN-CNRS 911 90, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.<br />

The solution structure of [d(TAGCGCTA)] has been solved by<br />

NOESY-distance-restrained simulations. S~ructures determined by<br />

different me<strong>th</strong>ods were systematically compared (e.g. restrained<br />

dynamics and distance geometry analysis). Assignments have been<br />

completed for all <strong>th</strong>e non-exchangeable proton resonances using NOESY<br />

and double quantum filtered COSY. NOESY spectra were acquired at 50,<br />

i00, 200, 400, 800 and 1200 msec. Volumes were obtained by several<br />

integration algori<strong>th</strong>ms and <strong>th</strong>ose me<strong>th</strong>ods were compared. Completely<br />

isolated peaks and well resolved crosspeaks were used in <strong>th</strong>e<br />

analysis. Distances were calculated from comparison of <strong>th</strong>e initial<br />

NOE build-up rate wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e reference distances (i.e. H2'-H2", H5-H6).<br />

I 91 OPTIMIZATION OF NMR DATAPROCESSING WITH PARALLEL<br />

COMPUTERS: Roy E. Hoffman* and George C. Levy, Nor<strong>th</strong>east Parallel<br />

Architectures Center and NIH Resource, Bowne Hall, Syracuse<br />

University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1200, USA.<br />

For 40 years, most computers have been based on a single<br />

processor in what is known as <strong>th</strong>e Von Neumann architecture. In<br />

<strong>th</strong>e early 1970's, vector and array processors were introduced for<br />

scientific data processing and subsequently for NMR data<br />

reduction. It is only recently <strong>th</strong>at computers wi<strong>th</strong> parallel<br />

processors have become widely available to NMR researchers and<br />

<strong>th</strong>e advent of compilers wi<strong>th</strong> parallel and vector optimization<br />

has enabled <strong>th</strong>e modification of algori<strong>th</strong>ms in order to achieve<br />

speeds previously only possible wi<strong>th</strong> supercomputers.<br />

In <strong>th</strong>is work an Alliant FX/80 system was used. This contains<br />

8 parallel processors, each wi<strong>th</strong> a vector facility, and has a<br />

maximum performance speed of 189 Mflops. Wi<strong>th</strong> a physical memory<br />

of 128 Mbytes and a virtual memory of 2 Gbytes it is ideal for 2D<br />

and 3D-NMR processing.<br />

iD-Fourier transforms are 20 times faster on <strong>th</strong>e Alliant<br />

<strong>th</strong>an on a VAX 8800 and 120 times faster <strong>th</strong>an on a VAX 11/750.<br />

However, <strong>th</strong>e speed o~ a single processor on <strong>th</strong>e Alliant when used<br />

wi<strong>th</strong>out vector optimization is comparable to a VAX 8800. We<br />

report increases of computational speed for o<strong>th</strong>er algori<strong>th</strong>ms such<br />

as 2D lineshape analysis, plotting, and peak-picking. These<br />

increases in speed are achieved in part by <strong>th</strong>e optimization<br />

facilities in <strong>th</strong>e compiler but much of <strong>th</strong>e enhancement arises<br />

from changes in <strong>th</strong>e source code.<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!