th - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference
th - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference
th - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 0 6 I AR'nFACT'3 IN ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING<br />
Hector E. Avram * 1), Lawrence E. Crooks 2) and David M. Kramer 1)<br />
1) Diasonics MRI, 533 Cabot Rd., Sou<strong>th</strong> San Francisco, CA 94080<br />
2) University of California, San Francisco, 400 Grandview Dr., Sou<strong>th</strong> San Francisco, CA 94080<br />
Since its introduction in 1978 (1), Echo-Planar imaging has developed into a real clinical posibility for<br />
imaging of <strong>th</strong>e human body when very high speed is required as in <strong>th</strong>e case of uncooperative patients and<br />
children (2). Echo-Planar allows acquisition of an entire image in a time under 0.1 sec.. This technique is<br />
based on <strong>th</strong>e use of succesive gradient-recalled echoes, individually phase encoded, to generate a 2DFT<br />
image. By switching readout gradient polarity, phase distortions occur which generate image artifacts<br />
mainly a ghost image L/2 away from <strong>th</strong>e primary image (where L is <strong>th</strong>e y-image dimension). It is found <strong>th</strong>at<br />
<strong>th</strong>ese phase distortions which arise mainly from magnetic field inhomogeneities, gradient instabilities and<br />
eddy current distributions, are to a certain extent predictable and <strong>th</strong>at wi<strong>th</strong> proper zero and first order<br />
phasing of <strong>th</strong>e echoes such artifacts are minimized if not eliminated.<br />
A scheme for an efficient way to phase correct <strong>th</strong>e phase encoded projections will be presented.<br />
(1) Mansfield P, Pykett IL, J Magn Reson 1978; 29:355-373<br />
(2) Crooks LE, et al, Radiology <strong>1988</strong>;166:157-163<br />
... 107<br />
'I~VO DIMENSIONAL NMR SOFTWARE IN THE<br />
WORKSTATION ENVIRONMENT<br />
Frank Delaglio °, Pascale Sole1", Hans Grahnl", Alex Macur,<br />
John Begemann, Molly Crow<strong>th</strong>er, Roy Hoffmanl", and George C. Levy.<br />
New Me<strong>th</strong>ods Research, Inc., 719 East Genesee Street, Syracuse, NY 13210.<br />
We present several techniques for optimal analysis of 2D NMR spectra, which rely bo<strong>th</strong> on <strong>th</strong>e<br />
computational power and advanced graphics capabilities of modern scientific workstations. Examples<br />
include me<strong>th</strong>ods from <strong>th</strong>e field of image processing, such as morphological filters, histogram<br />
equalizations, and various segmentation procedures. Such techniques, which improve data visibility,<br />
are most valuable when results can be obtained and examined quickly in an interactive scheme.<br />
O<strong>th</strong>er examples involve surface fitting of 2D spectra, a task which is of course computationally<br />
strenuous, but also benefits from flexible graphics for presentation and evaluation of results. We use<br />
surface fitting to compensate for baseplane distortions, measure 2D NOE peak volumes, and to<br />
simulate DQF-COSY crosspeak multiplets.<br />
An outline of o<strong>th</strong>er me<strong>th</strong>ods newly implemented in <strong>th</strong>e NMR2 two dimensional NMR software<br />
system is presented, including interactive bicomplex 2D phasing, 2D solvent signal subtraction, and<br />
connectivity analysis. We also illustrate our first-generation implementations for 3D NMR processing<br />
and presentation.<br />
"~ NMR and Data Processing Laboratory, NIH Resource and CASE Center, Syracuse University,<br />
Syracuse, NY 13244-1200.<br />
152