07.12.2012 Views

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1988 - 51st ENC Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 0 6 I AR'nFACT'3 IN ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING<br />

Hector E. Avram * 1), Lawrence E. Crooks 2) and David M. Kramer 1)<br />

1) Diasonics MRI, 533 Cabot Rd., Sou<strong>th</strong> San Francisco, CA 94080<br />

2) University of California, San Francisco, 400 Grandview Dr., Sou<strong>th</strong> San Francisco, CA 94080<br />

Since its introduction in 1978 (1), Echo-Planar imaging has developed into a real clinical posibility for<br />

imaging of <strong>th</strong>e human body when very high speed is required as in <strong>th</strong>e case of uncooperative patients and<br />

children (2). Echo-Planar allows acquisition of an entire image in a time under 0.1 sec.. This technique is<br />

based on <strong>th</strong>e use of succesive gradient-recalled echoes, individually phase encoded, to generate a 2DFT<br />

image. By switching readout gradient polarity, phase distortions occur which generate image artifacts<br />

mainly a ghost image L/2 away from <strong>th</strong>e primary image (where L is <strong>th</strong>e y-image dimension). It is found <strong>th</strong>at<br />

<strong>th</strong>ese phase distortions which arise mainly from magnetic field inhomogeneities, gradient instabilities and<br />

eddy current distributions, are to a certain extent predictable and <strong>th</strong>at wi<strong>th</strong> proper zero and first order<br />

phasing of <strong>th</strong>e echoes such artifacts are minimized if not eliminated.<br />

A scheme for an efficient way to phase correct <strong>th</strong>e phase encoded projections will be presented.<br />

(1) Mansfield P, Pykett IL, J Magn Reson 1978; 29:355-373<br />

(2) Crooks LE, et al, Radiology <strong>1988</strong>;166:157-163<br />

... 107<br />

'I~VO DIMENSIONAL NMR SOFTWARE IN THE<br />

WORKSTATION ENVIRONMENT<br />

Frank Delaglio °, Pascale Sole1", Hans Grahnl", Alex Macur,<br />

John Begemann, Molly Crow<strong>th</strong>er, Roy Hoffmanl", and George C. Levy.<br />

New Me<strong>th</strong>ods Research, Inc., 719 East Genesee Street, Syracuse, NY 13210.<br />

We present several techniques for optimal analysis of 2D NMR spectra, which rely bo<strong>th</strong> on <strong>th</strong>e<br />

computational power and advanced graphics capabilities of modern scientific workstations. Examples<br />

include me<strong>th</strong>ods from <strong>th</strong>e field of image processing, such as morphological filters, histogram<br />

equalizations, and various segmentation procedures. Such techniques, which improve data visibility,<br />

are most valuable when results can be obtained and examined quickly in an interactive scheme.<br />

O<strong>th</strong>er examples involve surface fitting of 2D spectra, a task which is of course computationally<br />

strenuous, but also benefits from flexible graphics for presentation and evaluation of results. We use<br />

surface fitting to compensate for baseplane distortions, measure 2D NOE peak volumes, and to<br />

simulate DQF-COSY crosspeak multiplets.<br />

An outline of o<strong>th</strong>er me<strong>th</strong>ods newly implemented in <strong>th</strong>e NMR2 two dimensional NMR software<br />

system is presented, including interactive bicomplex 2D phasing, 2D solvent signal subtraction, and<br />

connectivity analysis. We also illustrate our first-generation implementations for 3D NMR processing<br />

and presentation.<br />

"~ NMR and Data Processing Laboratory, NIH Resource and CASE Center, Syracuse University,<br />

Syracuse, NY 13244-1200.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!