14.12.2012 Views

GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO

GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO

GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86<br />

different. For very shallow water the result is an f –3<br />

frequency tail. This assumption has lead Bouws et al.<br />

(1985) to propose a universal shape of the spectrum in<br />

shallow water that is very similar to the JONSWAP spectrum<br />

in deep water (with the f –5 tail replaced with the<br />

transformed k –3 tail). It is called the TMA spectrum.<br />

The evolution of the significant wave height and the<br />

significant wave period in the described idealized situation<br />

is parameterized from observations in deep and<br />

shallow water with the following formulations:<br />

⎡ * m1<br />

* * m<br />

X<br />

H = Atanh( h ) tanh ⎢<br />

κ<br />

3<br />

1<br />

κ3<br />

*<br />

⎢tanh<br />

κ h<br />

⎣ 4<br />

m4<br />

( )<br />

⎡ * m<br />

* * m<br />

X<br />

T = Btanh( h ) tanh ⎢<br />

κ<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2π κ4<br />

⎢tanh<br />

κ h<br />

⎣ 4<br />

2<br />

* m4<br />

( )<br />

⎤<br />

⎥,<br />

(7.12)<br />

⎥<br />

⎦<br />

where dimensionless parameters for significant wave<br />

height, H * , significant wave period, T * , fetch, X * , and<br />

depth, h * , are, respectively: H * = gH s/u 2 , T * = gT s/u,<br />

Figure 7.4 —<br />

Shallow water growth curves for<br />

dimensionless significant wave<br />

height (upper) and period<br />

(lower) as functions of fetch,<br />

plotted for a range of depths<br />

Dimensionless significant wave height H*<br />

Dimensionless period T*<br />

<strong>GUIDE</strong> TO <strong>WAVE</strong> <strong>ANALYSIS</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FORECASTING</strong><br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

8<br />

10 0<br />

10 0<br />

⎤<br />

⎥<br />

⎥<br />

⎦<br />

10 1<br />

10 1<br />

X * = gX/u2 , h * = gh/u2 (fetch is the distance to the upwind<br />

shore). The values of the coefficients have been estimated<br />

by many investigators. Those of CERC (1973) are:<br />

A = 0.283 B = 1.2<br />

κ1 = 0.0125 κ2 = 0.077 κ3 = 0.520 κ4 = 0.833<br />

m1 = 0.42 m2 = 0.25 m3 = 0.75 m4 = 0.375<br />

Corresponding growth curves are plotted in Figure 7.4.<br />

7.6 Bottom friction<br />

The bottom may induce wave energy dissipation in various<br />

ways, e.g., friction, percolation (water penetrating<br />

the bottom) wave induced bottom motion and breaking<br />

(see below). Outside the surf zone, bottom friction is<br />

usually the most relevant. It is essentially nothing but the<br />

effort of the waves to maintain a turbulent boundary<br />

layer just above the bottom.<br />

Several formulations have been suggested for the<br />

bottom friction. A fairly simple expression, in terms of<br />

the energy balance, is due to Hasselmann et al. (1973) in<br />

the JONSWAP project:<br />

10 2<br />

10 2<br />

10 3<br />

Dimensionless fetch X*<br />

10 3<br />

10 4<br />

10 4<br />

Dimensionless fetch X*<br />

10 5<br />

10 5<br />

10 6<br />

10 6<br />

h* = ∞<br />

5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0.02<br />

h* = ∞<br />

10 7<br />

5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0.02<br />

10 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!