GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO
GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO
GUIDE WAVE ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING - WMO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
86<br />
different. For very shallow water the result is an f –3<br />
frequency tail. This assumption has lead Bouws et al.<br />
(1985) to propose a universal shape of the spectrum in<br />
shallow water that is very similar to the JONSWAP spectrum<br />
in deep water (with the f –5 tail replaced with the<br />
transformed k –3 tail). It is called the TMA spectrum.<br />
The evolution of the significant wave height and the<br />
significant wave period in the described idealized situation<br />
is parameterized from observations in deep and<br />
shallow water with the following formulations:<br />
⎡ * m1<br />
* * m<br />
X<br />
H = Atanh( h ) tanh ⎢<br />
κ<br />
3<br />
1<br />
κ3<br />
*<br />
⎢tanh<br />
κ h<br />
⎣ 4<br />
m4<br />
( )<br />
⎡ * m<br />
* * m<br />
X<br />
T = Btanh( h ) tanh ⎢<br />
κ<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2π κ4<br />
⎢tanh<br />
κ h<br />
⎣ 4<br />
2<br />
* m4<br />
( )<br />
⎤<br />
⎥,<br />
(7.12)<br />
⎥<br />
⎦<br />
where dimensionless parameters for significant wave<br />
height, H * , significant wave period, T * , fetch, X * , and<br />
depth, h * , are, respectively: H * = gH s/u 2 , T * = gT s/u,<br />
Figure 7.4 —<br />
Shallow water growth curves for<br />
dimensionless significant wave<br />
height (upper) and period<br />
(lower) as functions of fetch,<br />
plotted for a range of depths<br />
Dimensionless significant wave height H*<br />
Dimensionless period T*<br />
<strong>GUIDE</strong> TO <strong>WAVE</strong> <strong>ANALYSIS</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FORECASTING</strong><br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.02<br />
0.01<br />
8<br />
10 0<br />
10 0<br />
⎤<br />
⎥<br />
⎥<br />
⎦<br />
10 1<br />
10 1<br />
X * = gX/u2 , h * = gh/u2 (fetch is the distance to the upwind<br />
shore). The values of the coefficients have been estimated<br />
by many investigators. Those of CERC (1973) are:<br />
A = 0.283 B = 1.2<br />
κ1 = 0.0125 κ2 = 0.077 κ3 = 0.520 κ4 = 0.833<br />
m1 = 0.42 m2 = 0.25 m3 = 0.75 m4 = 0.375<br />
Corresponding growth curves are plotted in Figure 7.4.<br />
7.6 Bottom friction<br />
The bottom may induce wave energy dissipation in various<br />
ways, e.g., friction, percolation (water penetrating<br />
the bottom) wave induced bottom motion and breaking<br />
(see below). Outside the surf zone, bottom friction is<br />
usually the most relevant. It is essentially nothing but the<br />
effort of the waves to maintain a turbulent boundary<br />
layer just above the bottom.<br />
Several formulations have been suggested for the<br />
bottom friction. A fairly simple expression, in terms of<br />
the energy balance, is due to Hasselmann et al. (1973) in<br />
the JONSWAP project:<br />
10 2<br />
10 2<br />
10 3<br />
Dimensionless fetch X*<br />
10 3<br />
10 4<br />
10 4<br />
Dimensionless fetch X*<br />
10 5<br />
10 5<br />
10 6<br />
10 6<br />
h* = ∞<br />
5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
0.02<br />
h* = ∞<br />
10 7<br />
5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
0.02<br />
10 7