30.03.2020 Views

Craniofacial Muscles

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 S.L. Hebert et al.

type 3 and critical illness myopathy. However, these muscles do not seem as resistant

to pathology as other craniofacial muscles, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy

(DMD) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). They are also vulnerable to functionspeci

fi c pathology. The high forces and impact produced during chewing make the

masticatory muscles prone to pathology related to these high stresses and impact.

Further, masticatory muscles are adaptable, and so their phenotype and pathology is

in fl uenced by external factors such as stress, dentition, and diet, as well as to changes

in temporomandibular joint and respiratory function.

8.2 Developmental Anomalies

The masticatory muscles develop from cranial mesoderm of the fi rst pharyngeal

arch. The core of each pharyngeal arch is comprised of mesodermal and neural crest

cells. Proper development of the masticatory muscles is dependent on the speci fi c

migration and interaction between these two cell types. Syndromes of the fi rst pharyngeal

arch are typically caused by either improper migration or development of

mesodermal or cranial neural crest cells (Kapur et al. 2008 ; Passos-Bueno et al.

2009 ; Heude et al. 2011 ; Johnson et al. 2011 ) .

Hemifacial microsomia, a syndrome of the fi rst pharyngeal arch, encompasses a

wide variety of phenotypes including defects of the masticatory muscles, jaw, external

ear, as well as microphthalmia. As a result, this syndrome is also referred to by

a multitude of names—Goldenhar–Gorlin syndrome, fi rst arch syndrome, lateral

facial dysplasia, unilateral craniofacial microsomia, otomandibular dysostosis,

oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia, auriculo-branchiogenic dysplasia, and oculoauriculovertebral

spectrum. Patients with hemifacial microsomia may display defects

on one or both sides of the face.

The defects of the masticatory muscles differ widely across patients with hemifacial

microsomia. The affected side(s) of the face in these patients can exhibit reduced

size or complete absence of the masticatory muscles. Typically, the masseter, temporalis,

and medial and lateral pterygoids are hypoplastic and show reduced activity on

the affected side(s) though in some cases the masseter and temporalis are completely

absent (Moss and James 1984 ; Kapur et al. 2008 ; Heude et al. 2011 ) . While the exact

cause of hemifacial microsomia is not currently known, it has been hypothesized to

be due to a defect in the cranial neural crest cells (Heude et al. 2011 ) .

8.3 Sparing in Skeletal Muscle Disease

The masticatory muscles are completely spared in very few skeletal muscle diseases.

Masseter function is spared in some forms of SCA, but not in others. Patients with

SCA type 3 display a bilaterally normal masseter re fl ex response, while patients

with SCA type 2 have an abnormal masseter re fl ex (Garcia et al. 2009 ; Alvarez-

Paradelo et al. 2011 ) . The preferential sparing of masseter in certain subtypes of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!