30.03.2020 Views

Craniofacial Muscles

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 I. Harel and E. Tzahor

satellite cells (Fig. 2.3b , Harel et al. 2009 ) . In contrast, trunk muscle-associated satellite

cells (including tongue muscles) derive from the Pax3 + lineage; Pax3 + cells and

Pax3 expression are not seen in any other head muscles. In contrast, all head muscles

and their satellite cells derive from the MesP1 + lineage (including the tongue

and EOM), whereas the Isl1 lineage solely marks the pharyngeal arch-derived muscles

and their satellite cells (Harel et al. 2009 ) . In addition to lineage distinction,

differences in gene expression and differentiation potentials were observed between

satellite cells in head vs. trunk-derived muscles (Harel et al. 2009 ; Ono et al. 2010 ;

Sambasivan et al. 2009 ) . Transplantation of myo fi ber-associated head satellite cells

into damaged limb muscle contributed toward ef fi cient muscle regeneration (Harel

et al. 2009 ; Sambasivan et al. 2009 ) . Furthermore, in vitro experiments demonstrated

the cardiogenic nature of head-, but not trunk-derived satellite cells (Harel

et al. 2009 ) . Fewer head satellite cells from the masseter (see Fig. 2.1 ) are seen;

also, these cells are more proliferative, and display delayed differentiation relative

to the timing of differentiation of satellite cells derived from trunk muscles (Ono

et al. 2010 ) . Taken together, these fi ndings highlight a link between myogenesis in

the early embryo and the generation of adult muscle progenitor pools required for

muscle maintenance and regeneration (Fig. 2.3 ).

Heterogeneity in skeletal muscles can also be seen during adulthood, as re fl ected

in distinct genetic signatures and susceptibilities to myopathies in both head and

trunk skeletal muscles (Emery 2002 ; Porter et al. 2006 ) . In humans, several diseases

are characteristic of skeletal muscle tissue, and one of the longstanding mysteries in

the fi eld is why some muscles, but not others, are affected, even though they are

often located in close anatomical proximity. For example, Duchenne Muscular

Dystrophy (DMD), seen in 1/3,500 male births, results in lethality by the time these

individuals reach their mid-twenties, even with extensive intervention and health

care support in the later stages of the disease. Strikingly, in DMD patients, most

muscles are affected; yet EOM and laryngeal muscles are largely spared. This

fi nding re fl ects an underlying theme in muscle diseases: understanding why virtually

all myopathies affect only a subset of muscles is of great scienti fi c interest, with

potential clinical relevance. Hence the phenotypic outcome observed in diverse

myopathies maybe rooted in developmental underpinnings.

2.5 Distinct Genetic Programs in Trunk and Head Muscles

It appears that different intrinsic and extrinsic regulatory pathways control skeletal

muscle formation in the trunk and in the head, as indicated by genetic loss of myogenic

transcription factors in mice (Kelly et al. 2004 ; Lu et al. 2002 ; Rudnicki et al.

1993 ; Tajbakhsh et al. 1997 ) as well as by manipulations of tissues and signaling

molecules in chick embryos (Hacker and Guthrie 1998 ; Mootoosamy and Dietrich

2002 ; Noden et al. 1999 ; Tzahor et al. 2003 ) . While skeletal muscle formation in

both regions of the embryo requires either MyoD or Myf5 (Rudnicki et al. 1993 ) ,

mice lacking both Myf5 and Pax3 are completely devoid of trunk muscles, yet retain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!