30.03.2020 Views

Craniofacial Muscles

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 Z.-J. Liu

various dimensions (width, length, and thickness) in a region of the tongue may not

be parallel or compensatory to each other, thus incompatible with the hydrostat

theory. Our 3D digital ultrasound recording demonstrated that rhythmic and stereotypical

regional volumetric changes do occur during mastication and drinking, and

these volumetric changes are signi fi cantly larger in chewing (~45.6%) than in ingestion

(~31.4%) and drinking (~30.4%). The regional volumetric expansion mainly

results from widening and shortening, and posterior thinning in the tongue body.

The data also suggest that the theory of region-independent motor control of the

tongue (Slaughter et al . 2005 ; Hiiemae and Palmer 2003 ) , i.e., one dimension of the

tongue compensates for the other dimension or the loss of one dimension is parallel

to the gain of other dimension, may not really occur. The time-series analyses

between the dimensional and volumetric changes further revealed that the volume

expansion is primarily due to the increase of widths while thickness and length actually

decrease. If the overall changes in amplitudes of various dimensions are

counted, decreases in thickness and length are the two biggest contributors to volumetric

expansion. Therefore, regional volumetric changes are coupled with changing

widths in the same direction and with changing thickness and length in the

opposite directions (Liu et al . 2008c ) .

14.2.4 Tongue Kinematics in Relation to Jaw Movement

and Muscle Activity

Tongue kinematics are restricted neither to the simple protrusion–retrusion and/or

descending–ascending axes, nor to vertical rotation like that seen for the jaw, but

involves complex shape and regional volumetric changes during function. These

changes are produced by sequential muscular activity and accompanied by jaw

movement (Hiiemae et al . 1995 ; Napadow et al . 1999a, b, 2002 ; Liu et al . 2008c ) .

A number of studies have indicated a strong linkage between tongue and jaw movements

during feeding (Liu et al . 1993 ; Thexton et al . 1982 ; Palmer et al . 1997 ) , but

the linkage between internal deformation of the tongue and jaw movement is largely

unknown. High-speed video with fl uorescent markers glued to the lips and the

tongue tip revealed that during mastication, the tongue tip retracts when jaw opening

begins, with a time delay of 16–24 ms (Fig. 14.6 ). This very rapid movement

most likely relates to the control of the bolus, and this observation contradicts the

widely accepted notion that tongue protrusion coincides with jaw opening during

rhythmic chewing (Thexton et al. 1982 ; Liu et al. 1993 ; Palmer et al. 1997 ) .

Conversely, during jaw closing it is the corner of the mouth which retracts suggesting

that the cheek is responsible for guiding the bolus at this stage. The realtime

and synchronized study on tongue internal deformation, jaw movement, and

EMG activities revealed that expansion of tongue widths mainly occurs in the

occlusal phase of jaw movement and is less coupled with the activity of tongue

muscles, but the expansions of length and thickness are seen in the opening and

closing phases of jaw movement and are better coupled with activities of tongue

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!