Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Gro<strong>und</strong>water treatment technologies<br />
Christoph Schüth<br />
Contamination of gro<strong>und</strong>water with organic contaminants, especially chlorinated<br />
hydrocarbon compo<strong>und</strong>s (CHCs) and petroleum hydrocarbons as constituents of<br />
gasoline, is a wide-spread problem in industrialized countries. The treatment of the<br />
contaminated gro<strong>und</strong>water is in<br />
most cases achieved by<br />
pumping it through an<br />
adsorbent on-site, e.g. granular<br />
activated carbon (GAC). The<br />
efficiency of such a system can<br />
be further increased by air<br />
stripping the contaminants, as<br />
the sorption capacities of these<br />
compo<strong>und</strong>s on GAC are<br />
increased out of the gas-phase,<br />
due to the minimization or<br />
absence of competitive effects<br />
of the gro<strong>und</strong>water itself or<br />
other gro<strong>und</strong>water solutes.<br />
Fig. 1: HFM module. The contaminated gro<strong>und</strong>water<br />
enters the module at one side and flows over the<br />
shellside (outside) of the hollow fibers to the outlet.<br />
Nitrogen is used as an inert strip gas and is applied<br />
on the lumenside (inside) of the hollow fibers in<br />
counterflow.<br />
Furthermore, alternative<br />
destructive treatment options for the gas phase exist, e.g. catalytic oxidation, or<br />
reductive catalysis especially for chlorinated compo<strong>und</strong>s.<br />
Packed tower aeration is the<br />
most common stripping<br />
method, although it has<br />
several disadvantages. An<br />
alternative approach is the<br />
use of polypropylene hollow<br />
1<br />
100<br />
fiber membrane modules<br />
(HFM), that are routinely<br />
used for the degassing of<br />
process waters e.g. in the<br />
electronics industry or for<br />
0.1<br />
50<br />
the deaeration of bottled<br />
beverages (Fig. 1). With a<br />
very small footprint, these<br />
units provide a large surface<br />
area for mass transfer and<br />
enable an independent<br />
control of gas and liquid flow<br />
rates without the risk of<br />
flooding. Volume specific<br />
overall mass transfer<br />
coefficients for HFM<br />
0.01<br />
0<br />
0.01 0.1 1<br />
H (-)<br />
Fig. 2: Removal efficiencies for the 12 compo<strong>und</strong>s using<br />
three<br />
different experimental conditions (water flow rate<br />
constant<br />
tant at 0.4 l/min, gas flow and pressure combinations<br />
of 2.0 l/min and 0.25 atm (open circles), 0.8 l/min and 0.1<br />
atm (solid circles), 0.4 l/min and 0.05 atm (solid triangles)<br />
respectively, resembling constant Ra/w ratios of 20, and<br />
co rresponding mass balances (symbols with dotted lines).<br />
stripping have been reported to be an order of magnitude higher compared to packed<br />
C/C0 (-)<br />
NAP<br />
1,1,2,2-TCA<br />
MTBE<br />
- 141 -<br />
1,2-DCA<br />
1,2-DCB<br />
1,4-DCB<br />
CB<br />
cis-1,2-DCE<br />
TOL<br />
TCE<br />
PCE<br />
1,1-DCE<br />
Mass balance (%)