Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tower stripping, and therefore much lower strip-gas to water flow ratios are needed for<br />
an effective stripping.<br />
The removal of 12 organic contaminants from water using a HFM module was studied<br />
<strong>und</strong>er low strip gas flow to water flow ratios (up to 5:1). Removal efficiencies were fo<strong>und</strong><br />
to be strongly dependent on the Henry’s law constants indicating a substantial mass<br />
transfer resistance on the gas side. Vacuum can be either used to increase removal<br />
efficiencies, or to decrease the amount of strip gas that has to be treated without<br />
sacrificing efficiency (Fig. 2).<br />
The conventional resistance in series model was inapplicable to predict mass transfer<br />
coefficients in our experiments as it assumes, that at least for the operation conditions<br />
used here, the liquid side mass transfer resistance dominates the overall resistance for<br />
all compo<strong>und</strong>s (Fig. 3, left). Therefore, a new hybrid numerical and analytical modeling<br />
approach in the finite element simulator RockFlow/GeoSys for hydraulic flow and mass<br />
transport was developed. This approach enables the prediction of the removal<br />
efficiencies within a few minutes, whereas a pure numerical approach would require<br />
several hours to days due to numerical stability controls. The input parameters for the<br />
model are defined by the geometry of the HFM and the operating conditions, no<br />
empirical formulations are applied.<br />
The model allows the investigation of the main factors controlling the removal<br />
characteristics, e.g. the dependency on Henry’s law coefficient, gas side diffusional<br />
Kcalc (m/s)<br />
3.0e-5<br />
2.0e-5<br />
1.0e-5<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 1.0e-5 2.0e-5 3.0e-5<br />
K exp (m/s)<br />
C/C0 (-) m odel<br />
0.001<br />
0.01<br />
0.1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
C/C0 (-) experimental<br />
Fig. 3: Left: Calculated overall mass transfer coefficients K vs. experimental K.<br />
Calculations based on the resistance in series model. Right: Comparison of the<br />
experimental removal efficiencies (C/C0, with C being the outflow aqueous concentration<br />
and C0 being the inflow aqueous concentration) with the removal efficiencies calculated<br />
by the proposed model.<br />
resistance, and aqueous diffusion limitation, and also enables the efficient design of<br />
further organic removal systems based on the HFM technology. The model was able to<br />
predict removal efficiencies for all experimental conditions with reasonable accuracy<br />
(Fig. 3 right).<br />
- 142 -<br />
0.001