22.12.2012 Views

Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...

Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...

Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tower stripping, and therefore much lower strip-gas to water flow ratios are needed for<br />

an effective stripping.<br />

The removal of 12 organic contaminants from water using a HFM module was studied<br />

<strong>und</strong>er low strip gas flow to water flow ratios (up to 5:1). Removal efficiencies were fo<strong>und</strong><br />

to be strongly dependent on the Henry’s law constants indicating a substantial mass<br />

transfer resistance on the gas side. Vacuum can be either used to increase removal<br />

efficiencies, or to decrease the amount of strip gas that has to be treated without<br />

sacrificing efficiency (Fig. 2).<br />

The conventional resistance in series model was inapplicable to predict mass transfer<br />

coefficients in our experiments as it assumes, that at least for the operation conditions<br />

used here, the liquid side mass transfer resistance dominates the overall resistance for<br />

all compo<strong>und</strong>s (Fig. 3, left). Therefore, a new hybrid numerical and analytical modeling<br />

approach in the finite element simulator RockFlow/GeoSys for hydraulic flow and mass<br />

transport was developed. This approach enables the prediction of the removal<br />

efficiencies within a few minutes, whereas a pure numerical approach would require<br />

several hours to days due to numerical stability controls. The input parameters for the<br />

model are defined by the geometry of the HFM and the operating conditions, no<br />

empirical formulations are applied.<br />

The model allows the investigation of the main factors controlling the removal<br />

characteristics, e.g. the dependency on Henry’s law coefficient, gas side diffusional<br />

Kcalc (m/s)<br />

3.0e-5<br />

2.0e-5<br />

1.0e-5<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 1.0e-5 2.0e-5 3.0e-5<br />

K exp (m/s)<br />

C/C0 (-) m odel<br />

0.001<br />

0.01<br />

0.1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0.01<br />

C/C0 (-) experimental<br />

Fig. 3: Left: Calculated overall mass transfer coefficients K vs. experimental K.<br />

Calculations based on the resistance in series model. Right: Comparison of the<br />

experimental removal efficiencies (C/C0, with C being the outflow aqueous concentration<br />

and C0 being the inflow aqueous concentration) with the removal efficiencies calculated<br />

by the proposed model.<br />

resistance, and aqueous diffusion limitation, and also enables the efficient design of<br />

further organic removal systems based on the HFM technology. The model was able to<br />

predict removal efficiencies for all experimental conditions with reasonable accuracy<br />

(Fig. 3 right).<br />

- 142 -<br />

0.001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!