Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
Electronic Material Properties - und Geowissenschaften ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
detail by [5]. CMFs are apparently quite typical for omphacites from the EZ and the LSC<br />
from the Tauern Window, and are seldom described from other occurrences.<br />
An astonishing feature observed in several omphacite grains are faults which are not<br />
oriented parallel to a distinct crystallographic plane but have preferential orientations<br />
subparallel to (100); they are terminated by dislocations. These ‘non-crystallographic<br />
faults’ were apparently produced by moving dislocations. Attempts to analyze their<br />
displacement vector failed.<br />
While free dislocations are rare, small-angle grain bo<strong>und</strong>aries formed by one or two sets<br />
of dislocations are relatively frequent. In one case, even a recrystallizing grain was<br />
observed (Fig. 1a) forming a large angle grain bo<strong>und</strong>ary with the matrix grain.<br />
Polysynthetic twin lamellae on (100) (Fig.1b) are interpreted as deformation twins<br />
because growth twins of this type are unknown and the grain is obviously deformed as<br />
evidenced by free dislocations.<br />
Clinozoisite shows deformation twin lamellae on (100) with widths which vary between<br />
about 3 and 150 nm. They have been first observed in the LSC sample close to the<br />
interface to the EZ [2]. Garnet contained rarely dislocations and low angle grain<br />
bo<strong>und</strong>aries. Barroisitic amphibole displayed a small-angle grain bo<strong>und</strong>ary which<br />
consisted of segments parallel to (110), but otherwise no specific deformation effects<br />
were apparent.<br />
In conclusion: The TEM results show strong deformation of omphacite and clinozoisite,<br />
but garnet is almost free of dislocations. Comparison of these results with those by<br />
Barnert [6] on samples farther away from the interface to the LSC shows no significant<br />
differences of the effects of ‘normal’ deformation in the EZ omphacites and the<br />
deformation associated with the rapid exhumation. The only exception are the noncrystallographic<br />
faults in omphacite mentioned above which may indicate locally<br />
elevated temperatures.<br />
Fig.6: TEM electron micrographs of omphacite. (a) Recrystallising grain (bright grain in the left<br />
corner) growing into the omphacite matrix in which APBs are visible; bright-field image. (b)<br />
Omphacite with deformation twin lamellae on (100); dark-field image.<br />
[1] Glodny J. et al. (2005) Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 149, 699-712<br />
[2] Müller W.F., Franz G. (2004) Eur. J. Min. 16, 939-944<br />
[3] Champness P.E. (1973) Am. Mineral. 58, 540-542<br />
[4] Phakey P.P., Ghose S. (1973): Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 39, 239-245<br />
[5] Müller, W.F. et al. (2004) Eur. J. Min., 16: 37-48<br />
[6] Barnert, E.B. (2003) Doctoral thesis, TU Darmstadt, Fb 11<br />
- 157 -