25.07.2021 Views

Microbiology, 2021

Microbiology, 2021

Microbiology, 2021

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20.4 • EIAs and ELISAs 837<br />

• What do the direct and indirect ELISAs quantify?<br />

Clinical Focus<br />

Part 2<br />

Although contacting and testing the 1300 patients for HIV would be time consuming and expensive,<br />

administrators hoped to minimize the hospital’s liability by proactively seeking out and treating potential<br />

victims of the rogue employee’s crime. Early detection of HIV is important, and prompt treatment can slow<br />

the progression of the disease.<br />

There are a variety of screening tests for HIV, but the most widely used is the indirect ELISA. As with other<br />

indirect ELISAs, the test works by attaching antigen (in this case, HIV peptides) to a well in a 96-well plate.<br />

If the patient is HIV positive, anti-HIV antibodies will bind to the antigen and be identified by the second<br />

antibody-enzyme conjugate.<br />

• How accurate is an indirect ELISA test for HIV, and what factors could impact the test’s accuracy?<br />

• Should the hospital use any other tests to confirm the results of the indirect ELISA?<br />

Jump to the previous Clinical Focus box. Jump to the next Clinical Focus box.<br />

Immunofiltration and Immunochromatographic Assays<br />

For some situations, it may be necessary to detect or quantify antigens or antibodies that are present at very<br />

low concentration in solution. Immunofiltration techniques have been developed to make this possible. In<br />

immunofiltration, a large volume of fluid is passed through a porous membrane into an absorbent pad. An<br />

antigen attached to the porous membrane will capture antibody as it passes; alternatively, we can also attach<br />

an antibody to the membrane to capture antigen.<br />

The method of immunofiltration has been adapted in the development of immunochromatographic assays,<br />

commonly known as lateral flow tests or strip tests. These tests are quick and easy to perform, making them<br />

popular for point-of-care use (i.e., in the doctor’s office) or in-home use. One example is the TORCH test that<br />

allows doctors to screen pregnant women or newborns for infection by an array of viruses and other pathogens<br />

(Toxoplasma, other viruses, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex). In-home pregnancy tests are another<br />

widely used example of a lateral flow test (Figure 20.26). Immunofiltration tests are also popular in developing<br />

countries, because they are inexpensive and do not require constant refrigeration of the dried reagents.<br />

However, the technology is also built into some sophisticated laboratory equipment.<br />

In lateral flow tests (Figure 20.27), fluids such as urine are applied to an absorbent pad on the test strip. The<br />

fluid flows by capillary action and moves through a stripe of beads with antibodies attached to their surfaces.<br />

The fluid in the sample actually hydrates the reagents, which are present in a dried state in the stripe.<br />

Antibody-coated beads made of latex or tiny gold particles will bind antigens in the test fluid. The antibodyantigen<br />

complexes then flow over a second stripe that has immobilized antibody against the antigen; this<br />

stripe will retain the beads that have bound antigen. A third control stripe binds any beads. A red color (from<br />

gold particles) or blue (from latex beads) developing at the test line indicates a positive test. If the color only<br />

develops at the control line, the test is negative.<br />

Like ELISA techniques, lateral flow tests take advantage of antibody sandwiches, providing sensitivity and<br />

specificity. While not as quantitative as ELISA, these tests have the advantage of being fast, inexpensive, and<br />

not dependent on special equipment. Thus, they can be performed anywhere by anyone. There are some<br />

concerns about putting such powerful diagnostic tests into the hands of people who may not understand the<br />

tests’ limitations, such as the possibility of false-positive results. While home pregnancy tests have become<br />

widely accepted, at-home antibody-detection tests for diseases like HIV have raised some concerns in the<br />

medical community. Some have questioned whether self-administration of such tests should be allowed in the<br />

absence of medical personnel who can explain the test results and order appropriate confirmatory tests.<br />

However, with growing numbers of lateral flow tests becoming available, and the rapid development of lab-on-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!