25.07.2021 Views

Microbiology, 2021

Microbiology, 2021

Microbiology, 2021

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 • Foundations of Modern Cell Theory 81<br />

Wallin’s ideas regarding the endosymbiotic hypothesis were largely ignored for the next 50 years because<br />

scientists were unaware that these organelles contained their own DNA. However, with the discovery of<br />

mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in the 1960s, the endosymbiotic hypothesis was resurrected. Lynn<br />

Margulis (1938–2011), an American geneticist, published her ideas regarding the endosymbiotic hypothesis of<br />

the origins of mitochondria and chloroplasts in 1967. 12 In the decade leading up to her publication, advances<br />

in microscopy had allowed scientists to differentiate prokaryotic cells from eukaryotic cells. In her publication,<br />

Margulis reviewed the literature and argued that the eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria and<br />

chloroplasts are of prokaryotic origin. She presented a growing body of microscopic, genetic, molecular<br />

biology, fossil, and geological data to support her claims.<br />

Again, this hypothesis was not initially popular, but mounting genetic evidence due to the advent of DNA<br />

sequencing supported the endosymbiotic theory, which is now defined as the theory that mitochondria and<br />

chloroplasts arose as a result of prokaryotic cells establishing a symbiotic relationship within a eukaryotic host<br />

(Figure 3.7). With Margulis’ initial endosymbiotic theory gaining wide acceptance, she expanded on the theory<br />

in her 1981 book Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. In it, she explains how endosymbiosis is a major driving factor in<br />

the evolution of organisms. More recent genetic sequencing and phylogenetic analysis show that<br />

mitochondrial DNA and chloroplast DNA are highly related to their bacterial counterparts, both in DNA<br />

sequence and chromosome structure. However, mitochondrial DNA and chloroplast DNA are reduced<br />

compared with nuclear DNA because many of the genes have moved from the organelles into the host cell’s<br />

nucleus. Additionally, mitochondrial and chloroplast ribosomes are structurally similar to bacterial ribosomes,<br />

rather than to the eukaryotic ribosomes of their hosts. Last, the binary fission of these organelles strongly<br />

resembles the binary fission of bacteria, as compared with mitosis performed by eukaryotic cells. Since<br />

Margulis’ original proposal, scientists have observed several examples of bacterial endosymbionts in modernday<br />

eukaryotic cells. Examples include the endosymbiotic bacteria found within the guts of certain insects,<br />

such as cockroaches, 13 and photosynthetic bacteria-like organelles found in protists. 14<br />

Figure 3.7<br />

According to the endosymbiotic theory, mitochondria and chloroplasts are each derived from the uptake of bacteria. These<br />

(2000):951–961.<br />

12 L. Sagan. “On the Origin of Mitosing Cells.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 14 no. 3 (1967):225–274.<br />

13 A.E. Douglas. “The Microbial Dimension in Insect Nutritional Ecology.” Functional Ecology 23 (2009):38–47.<br />

14 J.M. Jaynes, L.P. Vernon. “The Cyanelle of Cyanophora paradoxa: Almost a Cyanobacterial Chloroplast.” Trends in Biochemical<br />

Sciences 7 no. 1 (1982):22–24.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!