24.12.2012 Views

Annual Report 2010 - Enel.com

Annual Report 2010 - Enel.com

Annual Report 2010 - Enel.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

veto to the adoption of resolutions liable to have a major<br />

impact on the Company (by which is understood<br />

resolutions to wind-up, transfer, merge, or split-up<br />

the Company or to move its headquarters abroad or<br />

change its corporate purpose, as well as those aimed<br />

at abolishing or changing the content of the “special<br />

powers”). Grounds for the veto must in any case be given<br />

and the veto may be exercised only in cases in which<br />

such resolutions are liable to cause concrete detriment<br />

to vital national interests;<br />

> appointment of a Director without the right to vote<br />

(and of the related substitute in case he or she leaves<br />

the office).<br />

It should be noted that, on March 26, 2009, the Court of<br />

Justice of the European Communities declared that, by<br />

adopting the provisions stated in Article 1, paragraph<br />

2, of the aforesaid Prime Minister’s Decree of June 10,<br />

2004 containing the criteria for exercising the special<br />

powers, Italy failed to meet its obligations under Articles<br />

43 (freedom of establishment) and 56 (free circulation<br />

of capital) of the institutive Treaty of the European<br />

Community.<br />

Thereafter, Decree of the President of the Council of<br />

Ministers dated May 20, <strong>2010</strong> abrogated the provision<br />

of the aforesaid Prime Minister’s Decree of June 10, 2004<br />

censured by the Court of Justice of the European Communities,<br />

which contained the circumstances in which<br />

the special powers provided under letters a), b) and c)<br />

could be effectively exercised. Article 1, paragraph 1, of<br />

the Prime Minister’s Decree of June 10, 2004, according<br />

to which the “special powers” may be exercised “only in<br />

the event of relevant and unavoidable reasons of general<br />

interest, with particular reference to public order, security,<br />

health and defense, in the form and through means which<br />

are suitable and proportional to safeguard such interests,<br />

also through the possible provision of appropriate time<br />

constraints, without prejudice to national and EU rules,<br />

and among those, in first instance, the non-discrimination<br />

principle“, remains applicable.<br />

248 <strong>Enel</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Corporate governance<br />

Employee shareholdings:<br />

mechanism for exercising voting<br />

rights<br />

The Unified Financial Act sets forth specific rules regarding<br />

voting proxies in listed <strong>com</strong>panies, which deviate – for<br />

such <strong>com</strong>panies – from the provisions set forth in the Civil<br />

Code and which were significantly amended following<br />

the implementation in Italy of Directive 2007/36/EC (relating<br />

to the exercise of certain rights of the shareholders<br />

of listed <strong>com</strong>panies) by Legislative Decree 27 of January<br />

27, <strong>2010</strong>. The foregoing specific rules govern the solicitation<br />

of proxies, which is defined as the request for proxies<br />

addressed to more than two-hundred shareholders,<br />

on specific voting proposals, or ac<strong>com</strong>panied by re<strong>com</strong>mendations,<br />

declarations and other indications suitable<br />

for the purpose of influencing the vote. However, the<br />

Unified Financial Act clarifies that the request for proxies<br />

ac<strong>com</strong>panied by re<strong>com</strong>mendations, declarations and<br />

other indication suitable for the purpose of influencing<br />

the vote, which is addressed by associations of shareholders<br />

to their affiliates – including those associations which<br />

put together employees who are shareholders – is not to<br />

be considered as solicitation of proxies – and, thus, is not<br />

subject to the relevant specific discipline – if such associations<br />

<strong>com</strong>ply with the specific requirements set forth by<br />

the Unified Financial Act.<br />

At the same time, the Unified Financial Act continues to<br />

hope for the bylaws of listed <strong>com</strong>panies to contain provisions<br />

aimed at simplifying the exercise of voting right<br />

through proxy by the employees who are shareholders,<br />

thus fostering their participation to the decision of the<br />

shareholders’ meetings.<br />

In such respect, since 1999, <strong>Enel</strong>’s bylaws expressly provide<br />

that, in order to simplify the collection of proxies by<br />

the employees-shareholders of the Company and of its<br />

subsidiaries, which are affiliated to associations of shareholders<br />

which <strong>com</strong>ply with the requirements prescribed<br />

by applicable laws, facilities for <strong>com</strong>munication and for<br />

the collection of proxies shall be made available to such<br />

associations, pursuant to the terms and modalities to be<br />

agreed upon from time to time with their legal representatives.<br />

In March 2008 the establishment of an employee-shareholders’<br />

association called ADIGE - Associazione Azionisti<br />

Dipendenti Gruppo <strong>Enel</strong> (Association of Employee-Shareholders<br />

of <strong>Enel</strong> Group) which possesses the requirements

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!