26.12.2012 Views

Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology

Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology

Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nei<strong>the</strong>r Creation nor Evolution<br />

Burmeister was infamous for a certain arrogant stubbornness that made him stick to<br />

opinions, once he had formed <strong>the</strong>se (Pooth 1966, 370). His view on autochthonous generation<br />

formed no exception to this rule, <strong>and</strong> he did not change his position in <strong>the</strong> later<br />

editions <strong>of</strong> his Geschichte der Schöpfung, not even when Darwinism had arrived in Argentina<br />

(Montserrat 2001; Salgado <strong>and</strong> Floria 2001) , relegating a single expression <strong>of</strong> disagreement<br />

to a brief footnote. In <strong>the</strong> last edition <strong>of</strong> his Geschichte der Schöpfung (1872), Burmeister<br />

merely corrected himself with respect to <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spontaneous generation <strong>of</strong><br />

entozoa, which he admitted does in fact not happen, insisting at <strong>the</strong> same time that <strong>the</strong><br />

different conditions that had reigned during primordial times justified <strong>the</strong> assumption <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> abiogenetic origin <strong>of</strong> species (Burmeister 1872, 352).<br />

Figure 2. Heinrich Georg Bronn<br />

(Junker 1991, p. 207).<br />

<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong>, Vol. 10 (2005)<br />

149<br />

Heinrich Georg Bronn (1800-1862) (Figure 2)<br />

Equally explicit with respect to autochthonous<br />

mega-generation as Burmeister was none o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> greatest palaeontologist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period,<br />

Georg Heinrich Bronn, who from 1833 was<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> natural science at Heidelberg. He did<br />

fundamental work in <strong>the</strong> systematics <strong>of</strong> fossils, his<br />

Lethaea geognostica (1835-38; later edns) as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

Index palaeontologicus (third part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> H<strong>and</strong>buch einer<br />

Geschichte der Natur, 1841-43) being for many years<br />

essential reference works in <strong>the</strong> field. Bronn's<br />

Untersuchungen über die Entwickelungs-Gesetze der organischen<br />

Welt während der Bildungs-Zeit unserer Erd-<br />

Oberfläche (1857) won <strong>the</strong> prize <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Sciences <strong>of</strong> Paris in answer to a prize question, set<br />

in 1850 <strong>and</strong> repeated in 1854, about <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fossil record (Bronn 1858, 1859). Bronn formulated<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> general laws <strong>of</strong> paleontological<br />

history, stressing progressive development towards<br />

increased complexity that followed a definite plan.<br />

Like Cuvier, he focused on adaptation to environment but diverged from <strong>the</strong> Cuvierian<br />

tradition by emphasizing that changes had been gradual. The course <strong>of</strong> life had been<br />

determined by a "terripetal" law, organic adaptations having kept pace with <strong>the</strong> evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth's crust, from pelagic to littoral, coastal <strong>and</strong> finally continental environments.<br />

meister 1848, 314). "Nimmt man dagegen mehrere Autochthonen an verschiedenen Stellen der Erde an,<br />

denen alle eine gleiche typische Idee zum Grunde lag, was der spezifischen Uebereinstimmung wegen gewiß<br />

der Fall war, so stoßen wir durchaus nicht auf irgend eine Schwierigkeit bei der Erklärung der wahrnehmbaren<br />

Unterschiede" (Burmeister 1848, 552).<br />

7 "Wenn wir demgemäß annehmen, daß die ersten Geschöpfe nicht unmittelbar in vollendeter Gestalt entst<strong>and</strong>en,<br />

sondern vielmehr in normaler Weise als jugendliche, unvollkommene Individuen unter Processen,<br />

die dem heutigen Entwickelungsgange ähneln, sich bildeten; so haben wir damit sogleich Alles gesagt, was<br />

über ihren Ursprung füglich sich sagen läßt, und können demnach in die Einzelheiten ihres Bildungsganges<br />

nicht weiter eingehen" (Burmeister 1848, 316).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!