30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 M.D. Stefano, A. Ferrarini, M. Delledonne<br />

8.2<br />

Activation of the Defense Response<br />

Plants exhibit a wide array of both passive and active defense strategies<br />

against pathogen attack. Preformed physical barriers (e.g., the cuticle and<br />

the cell wall) and biochemical defenses (e.g., antimicrobial toxins) are often<br />

insufficient to avoid spread of infection. Therefore, after recognition<br />

of the invading pathogen, plants activate a very effective arsenal of inducible<br />

defense responses (hypersensitive response, HR) characterized by<br />

hypersensitive cell death, tissue reinforcement and production of antimicrobial<br />

metabolites (McDowell and Woffenden 2003; Dangl et al. 1996;<br />

Hammond-Kosack and Jones 1996). The rapid recognition of pathogen<br />

infection is supported by a sophisticated surveillance system that is capable<br />

of distinguishing between self-generated signals and those emitted by<br />

pathogens (Holub 2001). It is followed by the establishment of systemic<br />

acquired resistance (SAR), a salicylic acid dependent long-lasting immunity<br />

against a broad spectrum of pathogens (Ryals et al. 1996). The HR<br />

requires active host protein synthesis and is kept under tight genetic control,<br />

being activated only if the plant detects a potential invader (Baker et<br />

al. 1997). In this way, plant cells autonomously maintain constant vigilance<br />

against pathogens by expressing large arrays of “R genes” (R, resistance).<br />

R genes encode putative receptors that respond to the product of “Avr<br />

genes” (Avr, avirulence) expressed by a pathogen during infection (Mc-<br />

Dowell and Woffenden 2003). This gene-for-gene interaction results from<br />

either direct or indirect interaction between the R gene and Avr gene<br />

products depending on the R–Avr gene pair. Evidence is emerging that<br />

RproteinsoftendonotrecognizeAvrproteinsdirectly.Inthe“guard<br />

hypothesis,” R proteins activate resistance by interacting with another<br />

plant protein that is modified by the pathogen (McDowell and Woffenden<br />

2003).<br />

R-gene-mediated activation of HR triggers a number of rapid cellular<br />

responses, including perturbations in ion fluxes and the pattern of protein<br />

phosphorylation, which precede the accumulation of ROS (mainly O − 2 and<br />

H2O2) and NO as well as the transcriptional activation of defense-related<br />

genes (McDowell and Dangl 2000; Cohn et al. 2001) (Fig. 8.1). These initial<br />

responses are followed by the production of phytoalexins, transcriptional<br />

activation of defense genes and hypersensitive cell death, which is a form<br />

of programmed cell death having regulatory and mechanistic features that<br />

are similar to apoptosis in animal cells, such as membrane dysfunction,<br />

cytoplasmic vacuolization, chromatin condensation and endonucleolytic<br />

cleavage of DNA (Gilchrist 1998). The interplay between ROS and NO<br />

contributes to the establishment of the HR and to the potentiation of defense<br />

responses (Blume et al. 2000). Downstream events are inhibited by some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!