30.01.2013 Views

References

References

References

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

Signals and Signalling Pathways<br />

in Plant Wound Responses<br />

JeremyD.Rhodes,JohnF.Thain,DavidC.Wildon<br />

Abstract The focus is on the most widely studied wound response: the systemic synthesis<br />

in tomato of the defence proteins known as proteinase inhibitors (PIs). In wounded tomato<br />

seedlings, the severity of the wound is a major determinant of the type of wound signalling.<br />

Minor wounds produce outcomes that are consistent with the transport in the phloem of<br />

achemicalelicitorofPIsynthesis.Severewoundsproduceoutcomesthatareconsistentwith<br />

the distribution of elicitors of PI synthesis and of electrical activity by hydraulic dispersal in<br />

the xylem. The main electrical events associated with severe wounds are action-potentiallike<br />

depolarisations in the sieve-tube-element/companion cell complexes; these events are<br />

considered in relation to the use of the terms “action potential” and “variation potential”.<br />

26.1<br />

Introduction<br />

Plants respond to wounding both locally at the wound site and at sites<br />

distant from the wound (systemic responses). The most widely studied<br />

response is the systemic synthesis of defence proteins, known as proteinase<br />

inhibitors (PIs), in tomato seedlings following mechanical wounding, first<br />

discovered by Green and Ryan (1972). Mechanical wounding has been<br />

widely used to simulate insect damage. Our interest has been to elucidate<br />

the nature of the signals and signalling pathways underlying this systemic<br />

response. We believe that we can distinguish two situations: rapid signalling<br />

following a severe wound, and signalling in the phloem following a minor<br />

wound. The distinction between the effects of severe and minor wounds, in<br />

our view, enables a synthesis of the published results from several different<br />

research groups.<br />

Severalcandidateshavebeenproposedasasignallinkingthelocalwound<br />

to the systemic response, including both chemical and physical signals,<br />

and a combination of the chemical and the physical: hydraulic dispersal.<br />

Given the complex nature of a wound, Bowles (1998) has highlighted the<br />

probability that such an event would give rise to multiple signals.<br />

Possible chemical signals include oligosaccharides, jasmonic acid, and<br />

the peptide systemin; all have been shown to be elicitors of PI synthesis<br />

(Bowles 1998). Current evidence, based on mutations affecting PI synthesis,<br />

favours jasmonic acid as being a systemic signal, with systemin acting locally<br />

at or near the wound site – GA Howe’s group, using minor mechanical<br />

Communication in Plants<br />

F. Baluška, S. Mancuso, D. Volkmann (Eds.)<br />

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!